Z1.0 and Z2.5 SoCal Values - Revision history

Maechlin at 18:40, 22 February 2011

2011-02-22T18:40:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:40, 22 February 2011
Line 12:		Line 12:
	The reasoning for retaining the Z2.5 value in the 2nd case is that the tomography may have some resolution on this part of the structure.		The reasoning for retaining the Z2.5 value in the 2nd case is that the tomography may have some resolution on this part of the structure.

	*[http://hypocenter.usc.edu/research/UCVM/socal_station_list_bdeps.txt Z1.0 and Z2.5 Data (Tab Delimited)]		*[http://hypocenter.usc.edu/research/UCVM/socal_station_list_bdeps.txt Z1.0 and Z2.5 Data (Tab Delimited Text File)]

	--		--
	<pre>		<pre>

Maechlin at 18:38, 22 February 2011

2011-02-22T18:38:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:38, 22 February 2011
Line 12:		Line 12:
	The reasoning for retaining the Z2.5 value in the 2nd case is that the tomography may have some resolution on this part of the structure.		The reasoning for retaining the Z2.5 value in the 2nd case is that the tomography may have some resolution on this part of the structure.

			*[http://hypocenter.usc.edu/research/UCVM/socal_station_list_bdeps.txt Z1.0 and Z2.5 Data (Tab Delimited)]
	--		--
	<pre>		<pre>

Maechlin at 20:37, 17 February 2011

2011-02-17T20:37:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:37, 17 February 2011
Line 5:		Line 5:
	All of these sites are within the region covered by CVM-H11.1.0. Most (all?) are within the tomography and basin region covered by CVM-S4.For sites outside the basin regions, but within the tomography region in CVM-S4, the Z1.0 value is zero and the Z2.5 value is usually zero.		All of these sites are within the region covered by CVM-H11.1.0. Most (all?) are within the tomography and basin region covered by CVM-S4.For sites outside the basin regions, but within the tomography region in CVM-S4, the Z1.0 value is zero and the Z2.5 value is usually zero.

	This is how ~~I have~~ handled these sites in the tabulation:		This is how Rob handled these sites in the tabulation:

	if Z1.0=0 and Z2.5=0, set both values to -99999 (means no data)		if Z1.0=0 and Z2.5=0, set both values to -99999 (means no data)
	if Z1.0=0 and Z2.5>0, set Z1.0=-99999 and retain Z2.5 value		if Z1.0=0 and Z2.5>0, set Z1.0=-99999 and retain Z2.5 value

	My reasoning for retaining the Z2.5 value in the 2nd case is that the tomography may have some resolution on this part of the structure.		The reasoning for retaining the Z2.5 value in the 2nd case is that the tomography may have some resolution on this part of the structure.

	--		--

Maechlin at 20:37, 17 February 2011

2011-02-17T20:37:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:37, 17 February 2011
Line 12:		Line 12:
	My reasoning for retaining the Z2.5 value in the 2nd case is that the tomography may have some resolution on this part of the structure.		My reasoning for retaining the Z2.5 value in the 2nd case is that the tomography may have some resolution on this part of the structure.

	~~I have not submitted the tabulation to NGA, but I plan to do so in a couple of days. Please let me know if you have any comments on this and I will incorporate them before sending to NGA.~~
	--		--
	<pre>		<pre>

Maechlin at 01:18, 17 February 2011

2011-02-17T01:18:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:18, 17 February 2011
Line 14:		Line 14:
	I have not submitted the tabulation to NGA, but I plan to do so in a couple of days. Please let me know if you have any comments on this and I will incorporate them before sending to NGA.		I have not submitted the tabulation to NGA, but I plan to do so in a couple of days. Please let me know if you have any comments on this and I will incorporate them before sending to NGA.
	--		--
			<pre>

	# Author: Rob Graves		# Author: Rob Graves
	# Date: Wed Feb 09 12:45:58 PST 2011		# Date: Wed Feb 09 12:45:58 PST 2011
Line 802:		Line 804:
	Valle de la Trinidad 99999 RANM 31.398 -115.714 -99999 -99999 -99999 -99999 40 40 240 240		Valle de la Trinidad 99999 RANM 31.398 -115.714 -99999 -99999 -99999 -99999 40 40 240 240
	El Centro - Meloland Geotechnic 1794 CDMG 32.773 -115.447 900 900 3120 5240 1360 1360 3060 3060		El Centro - Meloland Geotechnic 1794 CDMG 32.773 -115.447 900 900 3120 5240 1360 1360 3060 3060
			</pre>

Maechlin: Created page with 'Robert Graves (USGS) has produced the following table of information about SoCal velocity models. The attached file contains Z1.0 and Z2.5 values for the NGA sites in southern C…'

2011-02-17T01:13:29Z

Created page with 'Robert Graves (USGS) has produced the following table of information about SoCal velocity models. The attached file contains Z1.0 and Z2.5 values for the NGA sites in southern C…'

Show changes