CyberShake Status - Revision history

Maechlin at 00:04, 11 May 2012

2012-05-11T00:04:36Z

Maechlin: /* CyberShake Research Computing */

2011-03-24T02:33:40Z

CyberShake Research Computing

Maechlin at 02:33, 24 March 2011

2011-03-24T02:33:02Z

Maechlin at 23:13, 16 March 2011

2011-03-16T23:13:50Z

Maechlin: Created page with 'This page tracks progress in the primary CyberShake work areas. == Extended Earthquake Rupture Forecast == * New version of CyberShake rupture generator integrated into CyberSha…'

2011-03-16T15:41:53Z

Created page with 'This page tracks progress in the primary CyberShake work areas. == Extended Earthquake Rupture Forecast == * New version of CyberShake rupture generator integrated into CyberSha…'

New page

This page tracks progress in the primary CyberShake work areas.

== Extended Earthquake Rupture Forecast ==
* New version of CyberShake rupture generator integrated into CyberShake 1.2 study. (15 Feb 2011)

== California Velocity Model ==
* State-wide CVM meeting with USR Harvard (10 March 2011)
* Release of CVM-H with geotechnical Model (20 Feb 2011)

== CyberShake Parallel Code ==
*

== Automated Testing Framework ==
* Meeting at ISI on workflow-based Framework (16 March 2011)

== Site Selection ==
* Candidate state-site list posted (2 Feb 2011)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:04, 11 May 2012
Line 21:		Line 21:
	* CyberShake 1.2 Calculation of USC hazard curve using CVM-H v11.2. Impact on hazard curve was to increase the hazard estimate for this site. (10 March 2011		* CyberShake 1.2 Calculation of USC hazard curve using CVM-H v11.2. Impact on hazard curve was to increase the hazard estimate for this site. (10 March 2011
	* CyberShake 1.1 hazard curves using new Graves Rupture Generator. Impact on hazard curves from new rupture parametrization was, in general, to slightly reduce the hazard. (30 Jan 2011)		* CyberShake 1.1 hazard curves using new Graves Rupture Generator. Impact on hazard curves from new rupture parametrization was, in general, to slightly reduce the hazard. (30 Jan 2011)
		+
		+	== CyberShake Trac ==
		+	*http://northridge.usc.edu/trac/cybershake/
		+
		+	== Related Entries ==

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 == CyberShake Research Computing ==
-* CyberShake 1.2 SGT calculations for multiple CyberShake site queued (21 March 2011) to get broader view of impact on hazard estimate using CVM-H v11.2 we will calculate approximate 10 hazard curve SGT. We will then calculate hazard curves using both 1.0 and 1.1 rupture models.
+* CyberShake 1.2 SGT calculations for multiple CyberShake site queued to get broader view of impact on hazard estimate using CVM-H v11.2 we will calculate approximate 10 hazard curve SGT. We will then calculate hazard curves using both 1.0 and 1.1 rupture models. (21 March 2011)
-* CyberShake 1.2 Calculation of USC hazard curve using CVM-H v11.2. Impact on hazard curve was to increase the hazard estimate for this site.
+* CyberShake 1.2 Calculation of USC hazard curve using CVM-H v11.2. Impact on hazard curve was to increase the hazard estimate for this site. (10 March 2011
 * CyberShake 1.1 hazard curves using new Graves Rupture Generator. Impact on hazard curves from new rupture parametrization was, in general, to slightly reduce the hazard. (30 Jan 2011)

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 == California Velocity Model ==
 * State-wide CVM meeting with USR Harvard (10 March 2011)
 * Release of CVM-H with geotechnical Model (20 Feb 2011)
 == CyberShake Parallel Code ==
 * R.W. Graves SGT and seismogram synthesis code validated at 0.5Hz (April 2010)
 == Automated Testing Framework ==
 * Meeting at ISI on workflow-based Framework (16 March 2011)
-== Site Selection ==
+== CyberShake Research Computing ==
-* Candidate state-site list posted (2 Feb 2011)
+* CyberShake 1.2 SGT calculations for multiple CyberShake site queued (21 March 2011) to get broader view of impact on hazard estimate using CVM-H v11.2 we will calculate approximate 10 hazard curve SGT. We will then calculate hazard curves using both 1.0 and 1.1 rupture models.