UCVM Workshop July 2011 - Revision history

Maechlin at 16:39, 28 July 2011

2011-07-28T16:39:20Z

2011-07-26T21:58:02Z

2011-07-26T19:43:33Z

2011-07-26T19:43:18Z

2011-07-15T00:48:37Z

2011-07-15T00:48:17Z

2011-07-15T00:46:19Z

2011-07-11T21:41:06Z

2011-07-11T17:19:39Z

2011-07-11T17:15:02Z

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 *Date: Thursday, July 28, 2011
 *Time: 1:30 PM - 3:00 PM Pacific Time
+*[https://college.usc.edu/scecconnect Shared Desktop]
 == Presentation Material ==

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 *Date: Thursday, July 28, 2011
 *Time: 1:30 PM - 3:00 PM Pacific Time
 == Proposed Workshop Agenda ==

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 SCEC is coordinating a California Velocity Model development workshop for the week of 25 July, 2011. Workshop calls are typically 90 minutes in length. Please send agenda suggestions to Phil Maechling or Tran Huynh.
 *Date: Thursday, July 28, 2011
-*Time: 1:30 PM - 3:00 PM
+*Time: 1:30 PM - 3:00 PM Pacific Time
 == Proposed Workshop Agenda ==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Workshop July 2011 ==
-SCEC is coordinating a California Velocity Model development workshop for the week of 25 July, 2011. Final schedule will be coordinated by SCEC special projects group. Workshop calls are typically 90 minutes in length. Please send agenda suggestions to Phil Maechling or Tran Huynh.
+SCEC is coordinating a California Velocity Model development workshop for the week of 25 July, 2011. Workshop calls are typically 90 minutes in length. Please send agenda suggestions to Phil Maechling or Tran Huynh.
 == Proposed Workshop Agenda ==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Workshop July 2011 ==
-SCEC is coordinating a California Velocity Model development workshop for the week of 25 July, 2011. Final schedule will be coordinated by SCEC special projects group. Workshop calls are typically 90 minutes in length. Please send agenda suggestions to Phil Maechling or Tran Huynh
+SCEC is coordinating a California Velocity Model development workshop for the week of 25 July, 2011. Final schedule will be coordinated by SCEC special projects group. Workshop calls are typically 90 minutes in length. Please send agenda suggestions to Phil Maechling or Tran Huynh.
 == Proposed Workshop Agenda ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:41, 11 July 2011
Line 51:		Line 51:
	##Evaluate sensitivity of current evaluation system using 3 events and 3 CVM’s		##Evaluate sensitivity of current evaluation system using 3 events and 3 CVM’s
	##Chino Hills,Gilroy, Oakland and CVM-H, CVM-S4, CenCal		##Chino Hills,Gilroy, Oakland and CVM-H, CVM-S4, CenCal
		+
		+	== Related Entries ==
		+	*[[UCVM]]
		+	*[[Community Velocity Model]]
		+	*[[IDV]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:19, 11 July 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Workshop July 2011 ==		== Workshop July 2011 ==

		+	SCEC is coordinating a California Velocity Model development workshop for the week of 25 July, 2011. Final schedule will be coordinated by SCEC special projects group.
		+
		+
		+	== Proposed Workshop Agenda ==

	#UCVM Software Design		#UCVM Software Design

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 ##Standardized query interface
 ##How UCVM supports queries for non-standard models (e.g. How does UCVM handle elevation query using CVM-S4 (no elevation model)
 #Selected standardized statewide properties including:
 ##Topography
@@ Line 12: / Line 11: @@
 ##Statewide Geotechnical layer from Vs30 and Wald Vs30 topography relationship
 ##Georeference standardization
 #Selected UCM Coverage Region:
 ##Discuss portability of UCVM other regions including Central US
 #Currently Supported Models
 ##CVM-S4
@@ Line 24: / Line 21: @@
 ##Graves Northern Cal
 ##Lin Thurber statewide
 #Requirements for Hosted Models
 ##query interface
 ##projection definition
 #Options for storing hosted CVMS
 ##GTL etree
@@ Line 35: / Line 30: @@
 ##Lin-Thurber tables
 ##Po Chen CVM-SI mesh
 #Support for HPC creation of Large Meshes by UCVM
 ##parallel query capabilities
 ##large mesh making capabilities
 #ETREE support
 ##Description of etree import and export by UCVM
 #CVM Differencing capabilities
 ##Example differences between CVM-S4 and CVM-SI
 ##Proposed differencing tools
 ##Other CVM differences of interest
 #CVM Evaluation System Design
 ##Evaluation using point sources
@@ Line 54: / Line 44: @@
 ##Goodness of fit measures in use
 ##Proposed GOF measures to be used
 #Evaluation results for 3 events
 ##Evaluate sensitivity of current evaluation system using 3 events and 3 CVM’s
 ##Chino Hills,Gilroy, Oakland and CVM-H, CVM-S4, CenCal