Staff Priorities - Scott: Difference between revisions

From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Scottcal (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Scottcal (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(551 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Yesterday ==
== Current Items ==
*Reran USC mesh with CVM-SI26, worked well
*Modify CyberShake to work on RSQSim ruptures
*BW remote job issues, opened ticket
**Modify PreSGT step to determine list of points to save SGTs for from RSQSim rupture files
*CyberShake training
*Update CyberShake study wiki pages to point to SQLite files
*Create wiki page for CyberShake RSQSim, and upload sample seismograms


== Today ==
== Project Backlog ==
*Try 64-bit fix with GPU code on BW
*Run CyberShake post-processing on RSQSim events, once DB is populated
*Hopefully resolve BW remote job issues; if not, run test curves on Stampede
*Produce candidate site list for Bay Area CyberShake
*Rerun hazard curves with 1000m SGTs, 200m surfaces
*Investigate improved load-balancing for DirectSynth SGT handlers
*Run hazard curve using SeisPSA_large_mem
*Experiment with OMP parallelization for post-processing
*Run hazard curve using Pegasus RC and single UCVM executable
 
== Blocked ==
*No
 
== Follow-ups ==
*No
 
== Areas of Responsibilities ==
* CyberShake 1.4
* Broadband CyberShake
* Code migration

Latest revision as of 17:56, 1 February 2018

Current Items

  • Modify CyberShake to work on RSQSim ruptures
    • Modify PreSGT step to determine list of points to save SGTs for from RSQSim rupture files
  • CyberShake training
  • Update CyberShake study wiki pages to point to SQLite files
  • Create wiki page for CyberShake RSQSim, and upload sample seismograms

Project Backlog

  • Run CyberShake post-processing on RSQSim events, once DB is populated
  • Produce candidate site list for Bay Area CyberShake
  • Investigate improved load-balancing for DirectSynth SGT handlers
  • Experiment with OMP parallelization for post-processing