CyberShake Status: Difference between revisions
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Created page with 'This page tracks progress in the primary CyberShake work areas. == Extended Earthquake Rupture Forecast == * New version of CyberShake rupture generator integrated into CyberSha…' |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== California Velocity Model == | == California Velocity Model == | ||
* Maechling, Magistrale discussion about CVM-S and state-wide CVM development (23 March 2011) | |||
* State-wide CVM meeting with USR Harvard (10 March 2011) | * State-wide CVM meeting with USR Harvard (10 March 2011) | ||
* Release of CVM-H with geotechnical Model (20 Feb 2011) | * Release of CVM-H with geotechnical Model (20 Feb 2011) | ||
== CyberShake Parallel Code == | == CyberShake Parallel Code == | ||
* | * CyberShake working group call on Workflow monitoring (Dan Gunter, LBNL) and development of AWP-Olsen version of CyberShake code (23 March 2011) | ||
* R.W. Graves SGT and seismogram synthesis code validated at 0.5Hz (April 2010) | |||
== Automated Testing Framework == | == Automated Testing Framework == | ||
* Evaluation of Okaya simulation specification format (20 March 2011) | |||
* Meeting at ISI on workflow-based Framework (16 March 2011) | * Meeting at ISI on workflow-based Framework (16 March 2011) | ||
== | == CyberShake Research Computing == | ||
* | * CyberShake 1.2 SGT calculations for multiple CyberShake site queued to get broader view of impact on hazard estimate using CVM-H v11.2 we will calculate approximate 10 hazard curve SGT. We will then calculate hazard curves using both 1.0 and 1.1 rupture models. (21 March 2011) | ||
* CyberShake 1.2 Calculation of USC hazard curve using CVM-H v11.2. Impact on hazard curve was to increase the hazard estimate for this site. (10 March 2011 | |||
* CyberShake 1.1 hazard curves using new Graves Rupture Generator. Impact on hazard curves from new rupture parametrization was, in general, to slightly reduce the hazard. (30 Jan 2011) | |||
== CyberShake Trac == | |||
*http://northridge.usc.edu/trac/cybershake/ | |||
== Related Entries == | |||
Latest revision as of 00:04, 11 May 2012
This page tracks progress in the primary CyberShake work areas.
Extended Earthquake Rupture Forecast
- New version of CyberShake rupture generator integrated into CyberShake 1.2 study. (15 Feb 2011)
California Velocity Model
- Maechling, Magistrale discussion about CVM-S and state-wide CVM development (23 March 2011)
- State-wide CVM meeting with USR Harvard (10 March 2011)
- Release of CVM-H with geotechnical Model (20 Feb 2011)
CyberShake Parallel Code
- CyberShake working group call on Workflow monitoring (Dan Gunter, LBNL) and development of AWP-Olsen version of CyberShake code (23 March 2011)
- R.W. Graves SGT and seismogram synthesis code validated at 0.5Hz (April 2010)
Automated Testing Framework
- Evaluation of Okaya simulation specification format (20 March 2011)
- Meeting at ISI on workflow-based Framework (16 March 2011)
CyberShake Research Computing
- CyberShake 1.2 SGT calculations for multiple CyberShake site queued to get broader view of impact on hazard estimate using CVM-H v11.2 we will calculate approximate 10 hazard curve SGT. We will then calculate hazard curves using both 1.0 and 1.1 rupture models. (21 March 2011)
- CyberShake 1.2 Calculation of USC hazard curve using CVM-H v11.2. Impact on hazard curve was to increase the hazard estimate for this site. (10 March 2011
- CyberShake 1.1 hazard curves using new Graves Rupture Generator. Impact on hazard curves from new rupture parametrization was, in general, to slightly reduce the hazard. (30 Jan 2011)
