Study 15.12 Data Products: Difference between revisions

From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
← Older edit
Scottcal (talk | contribs)
8,097 edits
Scottcal (talk | contribs)
8,097 edits
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
| [[File:CS_Map_0.5s_Study_15_12.png|400px|thumb|left|0.5 sec geometric mean hazard map, all sites]]
| [[File:CS_Map_0.5s_Study_15_12.png|400px|thumb|left|0.5 sec geometric mean hazard map, all sites]]
| [[File:CS_Map_0.5s_Study_15_12_marks.png|400px|thumb|left|0.5 sec geometric mean hazard map, all sites, marked]]
| [[File:CS_Map_0.5s_Study_15_12_marks.png|400px|thumb|left|0.5 sec geometric mean hazard map, all sites, marked]]
| [[File:2008_NGA_Basemap_0.5s.png|400px|thumb|0.2 sec 2008 NGA basemap]]
| [[File:2008_NGA_Basemap_0.5s.png|400px|thumb|0.5 sec 2008 NGA basemap]]
|-
|-
! 1 sec geometric mean
! 1 sec geometric mean
| [[File:CS_Map_1s_Study_15_12.png|400px|thumb|left|1 sec geometric mean hazard map, all sites]]
| [[File:CS_Map_1s_Study_15_12.png|400px|thumb|left|1 sec geometric mean hazard map, all sites]]
| [[File:CS_Map_1s_Study_15_12_marks.png|400px|thumb|left|1 sec geometric mean hazard map, all sites, marked]]
| [[File:CS_Map_1s_Study_15_12_marks.png|400px|thumb|left|1 sec geometric mean hazard map, all sites, marked]]
| [[File:2008_NGA_Basemap_1s.png|400px|thumb|0.2 sec 2008 NGA basemap]]
| [[File:2008_NGA_Basemap_1s.png|400px|thumb|1 sec 2008 NGA basemap]]
|-
|-
! 2 sec geometric mean
! 2 sec geometric mean
Line 106: Line 106:
We did disaggregations for CyberShake and the 4 NGA-2s at 3 sigma at 0.5 sec and 0.2 sec, at prob=1e-4.  Below are images for each, along with the top 5 contributing sources:
We did disaggregations for CyberShake and the 4 NGA-2s at 3 sigma at 0.5 sec and 0.2 sec, at prob=1e-4.  Below are images for each, along with the top 5 contributing sources:


{ border=1|
{| border=1
! Data Source
! Data Source
! 0.5 sec value at prob=4e-4
! 0.5 sec value at prob=4e-4
Line 150: Line 150:
| 1.65g
| 1.65g
| [[File:PAS_Run4282_Disagg_4e-4_0.5sec_CY2014.png|300px|thumb|left]]
| [[File:PAS_Run4282_Disagg_4e-4_0.5sec_CY2014.png|300px|thumb|left]]
| 33.5% Raymond (source 247)</br>20.4% Verdugo (source 283)<br/>12.8% Elysian Park (Upper) (source 158)<br/>8.3% Sierra Madre Connected (source 273)<br/>7.2% Sierra Madre (source 271)
| 33.5% Raymond (source 247)<br/>20.4% Verdugo (source 283)<br/>12.8% Elysian Park (Upper) (source 158)<br/>8.3% Sierra Madre Connected (source 273)<br/>7.2% Sierra Madre (source 271)
| 2.66g
| 2.66g
| [[File:PAS_Run4282_Disagg_4e-4_0.2sec_CY2014.png|300px|thumb|left]]
| [[File:PAS_Run4282_Disagg_4e-4_0.2sec_CY2014.png|300px|thumb|left]]
| 31.8% Raymond (source 247)</br>18.6% Verdugo (source 283)<br/>15.5% Elysian Park (Upper) (source 158)<br/>7.1% Puente Hills (LA) (source 244)<br/>7.0% Sierra Madre Connected (source 273)
| 31.8% Raymond (source 247)<br/>18.6% Verdugo (source 283)<br/>15.5% Elysian Park (Upper) (source 158)<br/>7.1% Puente Hills (LA) (source 244)<br/>7.0% Sierra Madre Connected (source 273)
|}
 
We then plotted the CyberShake actual and GMPE log-normal ground motion PDFs for ruptures on the Raymond fault which dominates the hazard at short periods for this site. Plots are included for the mean magnitude rupture (M6.55) and the max magnitude rupture (M7.05). The CyberShake actual distribution is plotted in gray, and the GMPE log-normal distributions are in pastels. Vertical lines show mean values.
 
{| border=1
! Rupture
! 0.2 sec
! 0.5 sec
! 2 sec
! 5 sec
|-
! Raymond M6.55
| [[File:PAS_247_Raymond_rup6_0.2s_RotD50.png|300px|thumb|left]]
| [[File:PAS_247_Raymond_rup6_0.5s_RotD50.png|300px|thumb|left]]
| [[File:PAS_247_Raymond_rup6_2s_RotD50.png|300px|thumb|left]]
| [[File:PAS_247_Raymond_rup6_5s_RotD50.png|300px|thumb|left]]
|-
|-
! Raymond M7.05
| [[File:PAS_247_Raymond_rup11_0.2s_RotD50.png|300px|thumb|left]]
| [[File:PAS_247_Raymond_rup11_0.5s_RotD50.png|300px|thumb|left]]
| [[File:PAS_247_Raymond_rup11_2s_RotD50.png|300px|thumb|left]]
| [[File:PAS_247_Raymond_rup11_5s_RotD50.png|300px|thumb|left]]
|}

Latest revision as of 16:10, 22 September 2016

Hazard Maps

Below are hazard maps from Study 15.12 (150 ppi).

Basic Maps

0.2 sec geometric mean
0.2 sec geometric mean hazard map, all sites
0.2 sec geometric mean hazard map, all sites, marked
0.2 sec 2008 NGA basemap
0.5 sec geometric mean
0.5 sec geometric mean hazard map, all sites
0.5 sec geometric mean hazard map, all sites, marked
0.5 sec 2008 NGA basemap
1 sec geometric mean
1 sec geometric mean hazard map, all sites
1 sec geometric mean hazard map, all sites, marked
1 sec 2008 NGA basemap
2 sec geometric mean
2 sec geometric mean hazard map, all sites
2 sec geometric mean hazard map, all sites, marked
3 sec geometric mean
3 sec geometric mean hazard map, all sites
3 sec geometric mean hazard map, all sites, marked
5 sec geometric mean
5 sec geometric mean hazard map, all sites
5 sec geometric mean hazard map, all sites, marked
10 sec geometric mean
10 sec geometric mean hazard map, all sites
10 sec geometric mean hazard map, all sites, marked

Comparison Maps

2 sec 3 sec 5 sec 10 sec
Difference
Study 15.12 vs Study 15.4, 2 sec geometric mean, difference map. Warm colors are higher Study 15.12.
Study 15.12 vs Study 15.4, 3 sec geometric mean, difference map. Warm colors are higher Study 15.12.
Study 15.12 vs Study 15.4, 5 sec geometric mean, difference map. Warm colors are higher Study 15.12.
Study 15.12 vs Study 15.4, 10 sec geometric mean, difference map. Warm colors are higher Study 15.12.
Ratio
Study 15.12 vs Study 15.4, 2 sec geometric mean, ratio map. Warm colors are higher Study 15.12.
Study 15.12 vs Study 15.4, 3 sec geometric mean, ratio map. Warm colors are higher Study 15.12.
Study 15.12 vs Study 15.4, 5 sec geometric mean, ratio map. Warm colors are higher Study 15.12.
Study 15.12 vs Study 15.4, 10 sec geometric mean, ratio map. Warm colors are higher Study 15.12.

Comparison with NGA results

We would expect the stochastic results to show reasonably good agreement with the deterministic results, but they do not. Here are some data products to investigate this. We've chosen 3 sites with large differences (MRVY, s028, LAPD) and 2 we're familiar with (PAS, USC).

NGA-2 curve comparisons

We replotted the curves using NGA-2s (instead of NGA-1) for comparison, and RotD50.

Site 0.5 sec 0.2 sec
USC
PAS
MRVY
s028
LAPD

Changing RVSIG

We reran PAS using rvsig1 = 0.1; comparison curves are below.

Blue: rvsig1=0.1, black: rvisg1=-1.0
Blue: rvsig1=0.1, black: rvisg1=-1.0

Disaggregations

We did disaggregations for CyberShake and the 4 NGA-2s at 3 sigma at 0.5 sec and 0.2 sec, at prob=1e-4. Below are images for each, along with the top 5 contributing sources:

Data Source 0.5 sec value at prob=4e-4 0.5 sec plot 0.5 sec contributors 0.2 sec value at prob=4e-4 0.2 sec plot 0.2 sec contributors
CyberShake 1.08g
47.0% Verdugo (source 283)
23.4% Elysian Park (Upper) (source 158)
12.5% Raymond (source 247)
10.6% Puente Hills (LA) (source 244)
5.9% Puente Hills (source 242) 		1.35g
30.8% Verdugo (source 238)
30.7% Elysian Park (Upper) (source 158)
22.1% Puente Hills (LA) (source 244)
11.1% Puente Hills (source 242)
4.9% Raymond (source 247)
ASK2014 1.24g
28.7% Raymond (source 247)
17.0% Elysian Park (Upper) (source 158)
14.3% Verdugo (source 283)
7.2% Hollywood (source 184)
7.0% Puente Hills (LA) (source 244) 		2.81g
30.3% Raymond (source 247)
19.4% Elysian Park (Upper) (source 158)
15.1% Verdugo (source 283)
7.6% Puente Hills (LA) (source 244)
7.1% Hollywood (source 184)
BSSA2014 1.51g
30.5% Raymond (source 247)
25.4% Elysian Park (Upper) (source 158)
9.4% Verdugo (source 283)
7.0% Puente Hills (Santa Fe Springs) (source 245)
7.0% Puente Hills (LA) (source 244) 		2.48g
32.1% Raymond (source 247)
26.9% Elysian Park (Upper) (source 158)
9.1% Verdugo (source 283)
7.7% Puente Hills (Santa Fe Springs) (source 245)
6.6% Puente Hills (LA) (source 244)
CB2014 1.59g
33.6% Raymond (source 247)
21.0% Elysian Park (Upper) (source 158)
11.2% Verdugo (source 283)
8.0% Puente Hills (LA) (source 244)
7.7% Hollywood (source 184) 		2.78g
32.1% Raymond (source 247)
24.1% Elysian Park (Upper) (source 158)
9.9% Verdugo (source 283)
8.8% Puente Hills (LA) (source 244)
7.8% Hollywood (source 184)
CY2014 1.65g
33.5% Raymond (source 247)
20.4% Verdugo (source 283)
12.8% Elysian Park (Upper) (source 158)
8.3% Sierra Madre Connected (source 273)
7.2% Sierra Madre (source 271) 		2.66g
31.8% Raymond (source 247)
18.6% Verdugo (source 283)
15.5% Elysian Park (Upper) (source 158)
7.1% Puente Hills (LA) (source 244)
7.0% Sierra Madre Connected (source 273)

We then plotted the CyberShake actual and GMPE log-normal ground motion PDFs for ruptures on the Raymond fault which dominates the hazard at short periods for this site. Plots are included for the mean magnitude rupture (M6.55) and the max magnitude rupture (M7.05). The CyberShake actual distribution is plotted in gray, and the GMPE log-normal distributions are in pastels. Vertical lines show mean values.

Rupture 0.2 sec 0.5 sec 2 sec 5 sec
Raymond M6.55
Raymond M7.05
Retrieved from "https://strike.scec.org/index.php?title=Study_15.12_Data_Products&oldid=17472"