CSEP2 Experiment Planning: Difference between revisions
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Created page with "CSEP Working Group Home Page<br><br>" |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[CSEP_Working_Group|CSEP Working Group Home Page]]<br><br> | [[CSEP_Working_Group|CSEP Working Group Home Page]]<br><br> | ||
__TOC__ | |||
= Meeting Presentation = | |||
The presentation from today's call can be downloaded [[Media:Csep2_call_08_01_18.pptx|here]]. This page will be updated with more information as it becomes available. | |||
= Minutes = | |||
* Models within an experiement should produce shared outputs | |||
* Stochastic event sets provide additional value over grid-based forecasts | |||
* However, stochastic event sets are not complete catalogs which might need to be considered | |||
* The utility exists in understanding spatial hazard. Not as scientifically interesting, but useful. | |||
* Might consider adding classic ETAS to the list of initial models to provide important link to CSEP1 | |||
* U3ETAS-NoFault similar to classic ETAS | |||
* Might consider starting with simpler models than U3ETAS | |||
* Need to carefully consider handling external forecasts | |||
* International collaborations are important and we need to work to maintain them. | |||
= Proposed Groups = | |||
Below are the proposed working groups to help define experiments. | |||
== UCERF3 / Fault Based Forecasts == | |||
N. Field, M. Page, D. Jackson, and K. Milner | |||
== Aftershock Forecasts == | |||
A. Michael, J. Hardebeck, M. Page and N. van der Elst | |||
Latest revision as of 23:19, 1 August 2018
Meeting Presentation
The presentation from today's call can be downloaded here. This page will be updated with more information as it becomes available.
Minutes
- Models within an experiement should produce shared outputs
- Stochastic event sets provide additional value over grid-based forecasts
- However, stochastic event sets are not complete catalogs which might need to be considered
- The utility exists in understanding spatial hazard. Not as scientifically interesting, but useful.
- Might consider adding classic ETAS to the list of initial models to provide important link to CSEP1
- U3ETAS-NoFault similar to classic ETAS
- Might consider starting with simpler models than U3ETAS
- Need to carefully consider handling external forecasts
- International collaborations are important and we need to work to maintain them.
Proposed Groups
Below are the proposed working groups to help define experiments.
UCERF3 / Fault Based Forecasts
N. Field, M. Page, D. Jackson, and K. Milner
Aftershock Forecasts
A. Michael, J. Hardebeck, M. Page and N. van der Elst
