Computational Result Review Process: Difference between revisions
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Data-set specific, standardized, defined, checks ready for use internal researchers. For example, for a hazard curve, review checks might include: | Data-set specific, standardized, defined, checks ready for use internal researchers. For example, for a hazard curve, review checks might include: | ||
* no Nan | * no Nan | ||
* No amplitudes beyond | * No amplitudes beyond 5g | ||
* all rupture variations have amplitudes for all components | * all rupture variations have amplitudes for all components | ||
* no zero entries | * no zero entries | ||
Revision as of 18:32, 20 May 2015
We define three states through which large scale computational results increasing in confidence.
Define Data Set
Define which data set under consideration. For example, a hazard curve that is part of a study, might be considered complete, even if the full study is not complete.
Preliminary
Just created but complete
Reviewed
Data-set specific, standardized, defined, checks ready for use internal researchers. For example, for a hazard curve, review checks might include:
- no Nan
- No amplitudes beyond 5g
- all rupture variations have amplitudes for all components
- no zero entries
At study level:
- all hazard curves reviewed state, plus
- new hazard maps
- ratio maps between new results and 14.2
Publishable
Ready for use by external researchers.
