Staff Priorities - Fabio: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:54, 23 June 2016

BBP Code updates needed before git migration
- Remove GMT dependencies and files
- Move to argparse
- Simplify tests to use smaller files
- Remove unused data files in tests directory

NGA-West 2 validation on BBP - Total: 6 days
- Contact CG, collect input scenarios: 1 day
- Write test code: 1 day
- Run tests: 2 days
- Review results: 2 days

Set up High-F code repository - Total: 3 days
- Collect codes from groups, scripts - 1 day
- Select SVN/Github repository - 1 day
- Create repository - 1 day

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Yesterday ==
-* Follow-up with MS and EB regarding changing GP parameters in BBP Platform
+* Received revised Irikura code from AP
-** Contacted RG for information
+* Confirmed high-f plot parameters with RT
-* Follow-up with SGS and RG regarding running BBP in Korea
+* Generated plots for FUL, BRE, DLA
-** RG to provide GFs based on velocity model provided by SGS
+* Updated seism tools wiki entry with latest data/plots
-* Started thinking about BBP workflow for multi-segment ruptures
+* Patched seismtools bug in seism.py, typo in gof.py
-* High-F work
-** Reproduced Ricardo's results
-** Created wiki page with documentation
-** Found V2 files for DLA/BRE/FUL
-** Problem processing them: user error
-** Contacted RT regarding proper parameters
 == Today ==
-* Wiki page for Irikura method
+* Merge latest Irikura code from AP
-* Wiki page for multi-segment ruptures
+** Run Part-A (4 scenarios) & Part-B on HPC
 * Work on High-F
-** Refactor processing code
+** Push code changes into RT's git repo
-** Run plot scripts with 3-stations used in High-F
+** Start processing code refactoring
-** Hercules vs observations
+*** Split processing/gof in gof.py
-* Wait for new Irikura rupture generator code from AP
+*** BBP format
+*** Multiple seismograms to compare
 == Blocked: ==