CSEP Minutes 05-29-2019: Difference between revisions
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Participants Unknown. | Participants Unknown. | ||
Missing events cause lower estimations of spontaneous ruptures. | * Missing events cause lower estimations of spontaneous ruptures. | ||
How do we show there being superior predictability from a fault-based model? | * How do we show there being superior predictability from a fault-based model? | ||
Mw <4.0 cannot trigger events | * Mw <4.0 cannot trigger events | ||
Can we identify this issue when it happens? How can we determine a difference between a data and the model? | * Can we identify this issue when it happens? How can we determine a difference between a data and the model? | ||
Completeness parameters could cause different clustering properties, and may need recalibration of their model. | * Completeness parameters could cause different clustering properties, and may need recalibration of their model. | ||
Boost of ETAS models due to this issue of “slow nucleation” | * Boost of ETAS models due to this issue of “slow nucleation” | ||
Latest revision as of 19:14, 2 October 2019
Participants Unknown.
- Missing events cause lower estimations of spontaneous ruptures.
- How do we show there being superior predictability from a fault-based model?
- Mw <4.0 cannot trigger events
- Can we identify this issue when it happens? How can we determine a difference between a data and the model?
- Completeness parameters could cause different clustering properties, and may need recalibration of their model.
- Boost of ETAS models due to this issue of “slow nucleation”
