Staff Priorities - Scott: Difference between revisions

From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Scottcal (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Scottcal (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== Yesterday ==
== Yesterday ==
*Successfully tested TEST workflow with pegasus-mpi-cluster
*Tried to generated CVM-H model for TEST site using CyberShake workflow on HPC - ran into workflow + UCVM issues
*Queuing run with CVM-H to debug AWP issues, found a few bugs with SGT generator scripts
*Ran reciprocity with point source along Newport-Inglewood - still ringing, as expected
*Got "good" version of forward AWP-ODC from Yifeng's SVN
*Started full CyberShake PP on Kraken - am documenting and improving performance issues


== Today ==
== Today ==
*Get CVM-H model for TEST site, use for AWP run
*Finish debugging CyberShake issues on HPC
*Try reciprocity with point source along Newport-Inglewood
*Monitor full CyberShake PP on Kraken
*Try forward AWP run for point source
*Run forward AWP-ODC with point source
*Going to try full CyberShake site PP on Kraken, waiting for ISI feedback on properties file
*Run AWP-ODC-SGT with CVM-H when we get it
*Insert hypocenters for RV4 into DB


== Blocked ==
== Blocked ==

Revision as of 18:01, 10 April 2012

Yesterday

  • Tried to generated CVM-H model for TEST site using CyberShake workflow on HPC - ran into workflow + UCVM issues
  • Ran reciprocity with point source along Newport-Inglewood - still ringing, as expected
  • Got "good" version of forward AWP-ODC from Yifeng's SVN
  • Started full CyberShake PP on Kraken - am documenting and improving performance issues

Today

  • Finish debugging CyberShake issues on HPC
  • Monitor full CyberShake PP on Kraken
  • Run forward AWP-ODC with point source
  • Run AWP-ODC-SGT with CVM-H when we get it
  • Insert hypocenters for RV4 into DB

Blocked

  • No

Follow-ups

  • No

Areas of Responsibilities

  • CyberShake 1.4
  • Broadband CyberShake
  • Code migration