Staff Priorities - Scott: Difference between revisions

From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Scottcal (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Scottcal (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== Yesterday ==
== Yesterday ==
*Examined failing LGU sub-wf - mem issue, changed jbsim3d too
*Tried to get the magnitude differences with a point source, didn't work
*Finished LGU workflow on Kraken
*Queued up AWP forward run
*Submitted new wf on Kraken to get better timing info
*Checked in modified AWP SGT code
*Tried to create AWP extended source, not confident
*Started testing new version of JBSim3d (header, in-mem RVs, memcached)
*TAU run finally completed, 87% of time in MPI_Sendrecv()
*Commented on EarthCube discussion per Ewa's request
*Reran full-scale RWG test on Kraken with optimized code + PGI


== Today ==
== Today ==
*See if we can get the magnitude differences with a point source
*Continue testing new version of JBSim3d
*Check in modified AWP SGT code
*Check results of AWP forward run, RWG forward run
*Test new version of JBSim3d
*Check on s351 workflow run, get PP metrics
*Leave comment on EarthCube discussion per Ewa's request
*Check on runtime of full-scale CyberShake RWG SGTs


== Blocked ==
== Blocked ==

Revision as of 17:10, 30 April 2012

Yesterday

  • Tried to get the magnitude differences with a point source, didn't work
  • Queued up AWP forward run
  • Checked in modified AWP SGT code
  • Started testing new version of JBSim3d (header, in-mem RVs, memcached)
  • Commented on EarthCube discussion per Ewa's request

Today

  • Continue testing new version of JBSim3d
  • Check results of AWP forward run, RWG forward run
  • Check on s351 workflow run, get PP metrics
  • Check on runtime of full-scale CyberShake RWG SGTs

Blocked

  • No

Follow-ups

  • No

Areas of Responsibilities

  • CyberShake 1.4
  • Broadband CyberShake
  • Code migration