Staff Priorities - Fabio: Difference between revisions

From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
Fsilva (talk | contribs)
1,730 edits
No edit summary
Fsilva (talk | contribs)
1,730 edits
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
* Fling Study
* Fling Study
** We are now 41/42
** We are now 41/42
** Scenario 124 finished on Saturday, needs to be verified
** Scenario 124 is good, data is moved, tar file was generated
** Running scenario 118 on HPCC, using trunk and updated parallel scripts
** Running scenario 118 on HPCC, using trunk and updated parallel scripts
** Scenario 118 is 210/241 stations, should finish on Wednesday
** Scenario 118 is 230/241 stations, should finish on Wednesday
** Updated wiki tables: http://scec.usc.edu/scecpedia/Fling_Study#Codebase_URS.2FURS.2FURS.2FURS
** Updated wiki tables: http://scec.usc.edu/scecpedia/Fling_Study#Codebase_URS.2FURS.2FURS.2FURS
* Started work on Python code to fix failure in URS pipeline (due to long file paths)
** Fixed site response module, but found other modules also have similar issue
* Fixed Trac issue #77 (UCSB LP validation)
* Fixed Trac issue #77 (UCSB LP validation)
* Met with Phil, discussed design ideas and priorities for Broadband development
* Broadband science call
* Trac issue #104: Environment variables select GF and validation directories: done, testing
* Trac issue #104: Environment variables select GF and validation directories: done, testing
* Trac issue #82: Separate validation code from Greens Functions: done, testing
* Trac issue #82: Separate validation code from Greens Functions: done, testing
Line 16: Line 16:


* Fling Study
* Fling Study
** Verify scenario 124, generate tar file, and post data
** Monitoring last running scenario, should finish tomorrow
** Monitoring last running scenario
* Trac issue #143: Improve GP pipeline to better handle long file paths, modules that need work are:
* Fix issue in GP code where filenames are cut short in site response module
** respect
** match
** gof
** possibly others too
* Trac issue #131: Package new parallel running scripts and check them into svn as part of BBP
* Trac issue #131: Package new parallel running scripts and check them into svn as part of BBP
* Trac #104: Write sample scripts
* Trac #104: Write sample scripts

Revision as of 23:31, 10 July 2012

Yesterday:

  • Fling Study
  • Started work on Python code to fix failure in URS pipeline (due to long file paths)
    • Fixed site response module, but found other modules also have similar issue
  • Fixed Trac issue #77 (UCSB LP validation)
  • Trac issue #104: Environment variables select GF and validation directories: done, testing
  • Trac issue #82: Separate validation code from Greens Functions: done, testing

Today:

  • Fling Study
    • Monitoring last running scenario, should finish tomorrow
  • Trac issue #143: Improve GP pipeline to better handle long file paths, modules that need work are:
    • respect
    • match
    • gof
    • possibly others too
  • Trac issue #131: Package new parallel running scripts and check them into svn as part of BBP
  • Trac #104: Write sample scripts
  • Trac #82: Run more acceptance tests
  • Trac #84: User selectable Greens Functions
  • Continue sketching BBP workflow (component by component with input and output files)
  • Trac issue #128: Start work on Cruise Control setup

Blocked:

  • No

Followups:

  • No

Ongoing:

  • Look for ways to break up the GF directory layout, some ideas are:
    • Figure out how to separate the validation data from Greens Functions
    • Create separate validation package
    • Separate events from each other
Retrieved from "https://strike.scec.org/index.php?title=Staff_Priorities_-_Fabio&oldid=5497"