Staff Priorities - Scott: Difference between revisions
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Yesterday == | == Yesterday == | ||
* | *AWP SGT jobs at USC finished | ||
* | *Ran verification test with RWG v3.0.3, seeing ~10% differences | ||
*Emailed Rob with test results and analysis of differences, Rob says expected | |||
*Submitted TEST SGTs on hpc to verify that v3.0.3 results on Kraken are good | |||
*Submitted USC SGTs on kraken to get hazard curve | |||
*Worked on direct calculation of UCVM in AWP format | |||
== Today == | == Today == | ||
* | *Run PP with AWP SGTs at USC | ||
*Monitor | *Monitor RWG TEST and USC SGT runs | ||
*Run tests of UCVM in AWP format | |||
* | |||
== Blocked == | == Blocked == | ||
| Line 13: | Line 16: | ||
== Follow-ups == | == Follow-ups == | ||
* | *Phil regarding CyberShake | ||
*CyberShake call | |||
*Email CyberShake papers to Liwen | |||
*Continue testing compiler optimizations | *Continue testing compiler optimizations | ||
*Run some I/O tests to get reference values | *Run some I/O tests to get reference values | ||
Revision as of 17:06, 19 September 2012
Yesterday
- AWP SGT jobs at USC finished
- Ran verification test with RWG v3.0.3, seeing ~10% differences
- Emailed Rob with test results and analysis of differences, Rob says expected
- Submitted TEST SGTs on hpc to verify that v3.0.3 results on Kraken are good
- Submitted USC SGTs on kraken to get hazard curve
- Worked on direct calculation of UCVM in AWP format
Today
- Run PP with AWP SGTs at USC
- Monitor RWG TEST and USC SGT runs
- Run tests of UCVM in AWP format
Blocked
- No
Follow-ups
- Phil regarding CyberShake
- CyberShake call
- Email CyberShake papers to Liwen
- Continue testing compiler optimizations
- Run some I/O tests to get reference values
Areas of Responsibilities
- CyberShake 1.4
- Broadband CyberShake
- Code migration
