Staff Priorities - Scott: Difference between revisions
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Yesterday == | == Yesterday == | ||
* | *Extracted v3 vs v3.0.3 seismograms at 218/267/11 rupture, sent to Rob | ||
* | *Responded to Manuela (post-doc with Norm) about right Run IDs to use with CyberShake data | ||
* | *Compared v3.0.3 TEST runs from HPC and Kraken, good match | ||
* | *Continued tracking down SGTs for production run | ||
*Finished USC hazard curves with AWP | |||
== Today == | == Today == | ||
*Check UCVM AWP results - start with projection | *Check UCVM AWP results - start with projection | ||
* | *Finish finding SGTs for production run | ||
*RWG USC curves almost done, do comparison when complete | |||
* | |||
== Blocked == | == Blocked == | ||
| Line 23: | Line 18: | ||
*Run test of I/O forwarding on Kraken | |||
*Email CyberShake papers to Liwen | *Email CyberShake papers to Liwen | ||
*Continue testing compiler optimizations | *Continue testing compiler optimizations | ||
Revision as of 17:05, 21 September 2012
Yesterday
- Extracted v3 vs v3.0.3 seismograms at 218/267/11 rupture, sent to Rob
- Responded to Manuela (post-doc with Norm) about right Run IDs to use with CyberShake data
- Compared v3.0.3 TEST runs from HPC and Kraken, good match
- Continued tracking down SGTs for production run
- Finished USC hazard curves with AWP
Today
- Check UCVM AWP results - start with projection
- Finish finding SGTs for production run
- RWG USC curves almost done, do comparison when complete
Blocked
- No
Follow-ups
- No
- Run test of I/O forwarding on Kraken
- Email CyberShake papers to Liwen
- Continue testing compiler optimizations
- Run some I/O tests to get reference values
Areas of Responsibilities
- CyberShake 1.4
- Broadband CyberShake
- Code migration