Staff Priorities - Fabio: Difference between revisions

From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Fsilva (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Fsilva (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
* Continued working on BBToolbox integration
* Continued working on BBToolbox integration
** Different ways to handle scenario and validation simulations
** Different ways to handle scenario and validation simulations
* Ran 50-realization UCSB on HPCC
** Ran full Northridge with SDSU seismograms, results look good
** Results available
** Started full Northridge with GP low-frequency simulations, still going on
* Worked with JY to change Python path on HPCC
** Started full LOMAP-scenario mode with GP-SDSU codebases
** Folks should use /home/scec-00/opt/python/default
* Sent 50-realization UCSB on HPCC results to RA, JC
* Cleaned-up LOMAP validation package


== Today: ==
== Today: ==


* Continue integrating BBToolbox into BBP
* Continue integrating BBToolbox into BBP
** Try to run LOMAP with BBToolbox
** Send status update to Kim, Rumi
** Send status update to Kim, Rumi
* Run 50-realization UCSB on HPCC
* Look into UCSB's seismograms
** Investigate 10g's differences for some stations


== Blocked: ==
== Blocked: ==
Line 19: Line 20:


== Followups: ==
== Followups: ==
* Cybershake review 11am-1pm
* No

Revision as of 17:05, 4 October 2012

Yesterday:

  • Continued working on BBToolbox integration
    • Different ways to handle scenario and validation simulations
    • Ran full Northridge with SDSU seismograms, results look good
    • Started full Northridge with GP low-frequency simulations, still going on
    • Started full LOMAP-scenario mode with GP-SDSU codebases
  • Sent 50-realization UCSB on HPCC results to RA, JC
  • Cleaned-up LOMAP validation package

Today:

  • Continue integrating BBToolbox into BBP
    • Send status update to Kim, Rumi
  • Look into UCSB's seismograms
    • Investigate 10g's differences for some stations

Blocked:

  • No

Followups:

  • No