CyberShake PBR Study: Difference between revisions
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== PBR Site == | == PBR Site == | ||
''' | '''Low Freq seismograms''' | ||
* PERRIS | |||
* Lat/Long | |||
* Nearby Faults: | |||
**Fault Name: | |||
**Src/Rupture Number: | |||
**Number of rupture variations: | |||
**Fault Parallel (degree's off North) | |||
'''Broadband seismograms''' | |||
* PERRIS | * PERRIS | ||
* Lat/Long | * Lat/Long | ||
Revision as of 18:52, 8 March 2013
This CyberShake Precarious Balanced Rock Study will evaluate whether CyberShake ground motions are likely to knock over known Precarious Rocks
PBR Site
Low Freq seismograms
- PERRIS
- Lat/Long
- Nearby Faults:
- Fault Name:
- Src/Rupture Number:
- Number of rupture variations:
- Fault Parallel (degree's off North)
Broadband seismograms
- PERRIS
- Lat/Long
- Nearby Faults:
- Fault Name:
- Src/Rupture Number:
- Number of rupture variations:
- Fault Parallel (degree's off North)
Steps
- ask sc what code to calculate peak amps
- define output format schema
- implement in db and table in sqllite
- write test
- Find location of Perris PBR
- Find nearest src/rupture
- Estimate Rotation Angle of each fault
