Staff Priorities - Fabio: Difference between revisions

From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Fsilva (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Fsilva (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== Yesterday: ==
== Yesterday: ==


* Created updated validation packages for RT
* Started working on Composite Source Model code
* Sent RT instructions on how to update her epicenter setup
** Talked to JA, got input files and comparison seismograms
* Sent JA another message about his code
** Compiled fortran codes
* Received software package with some instructions
** Ran codes manually
* Finished testing CSEP metadata code
** Greens Functions, and Simulation code
** Modifications for use in the BBP
** -O3 improves GF code performance by 40%, no changes to results, 10 stations/hr
** Simulation code takes about 1 minute per realization (40 stations)
** Results don't compare back to JAs data set, need to get updated synthetics from him
* Broadband science call
** Presented results of 6 scenarios using GP and 3 scenarios using ExSIM
** GP scenarios improved, ExSIM scenarios got slightly worse
* Finished etadata code
** Use compile-time versions for compilers
** Tested everything
** Code checked into svn
** Added start/end timestamps to BBP summary html file


== Today: ==
== Today: ==


* Start working on JA's code
* Start CSM Broadband module, automate manual steps
* Few modifications to the metadata code before checkin
* Talk to JC about getting updated packages
** Improve compiler version checks
* Generate a Mojave velocity model for RS
* Improve simulation timestamp handling
** Also other data files for her to test the SDSU pipeline
* Ping KA about updates
* E-mail CG about adding GMPE results to Part-A scenarios


== Blocked: ==
== Blocked: ==
Line 19: Line 31:


== Followups: ==
== Followups: ==
* No
* Call with JC @ tbd

Revision as of 18:03, 1 April 2013

Yesterday:

  • Started working on Composite Source Model code
    • Talked to JA, got input files and comparison seismograms
    • Compiled fortran codes
    • Ran codes manually
    • Greens Functions, and Simulation code
    • -O3 improves GF code performance by 40%, no changes to results, 10 stations/hr
    • Simulation code takes about 1 minute per realization (40 stations)
    • Results don't compare back to JAs data set, need to get updated synthetics from him
  • Broadband science call
    • Presented results of 6 scenarios using GP and 3 scenarios using ExSIM
    • GP scenarios improved, ExSIM scenarios got slightly worse
  • Finished etadata code
    • Use compile-time versions for compilers
    • Tested everything
    • Code checked into svn
    • Added start/end timestamps to BBP summary html file

Today:

  • Start CSM Broadband module, automate manual steps
  • Talk to JC about getting updated packages
  • Generate a Mojave velocity model for RS
    • Also other data files for her to test the SDSU pipeline
  • Ping KA about updates
  • E-mail CG about adding GMPE results to Part-A scenarios

Blocked:

  • No

Followups:

  • Call with JC @ tbd