Staff Priorities - David: Difference between revisions
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Yesterday == | == Yesterday == | ||
- | - Revisited status of CVMs<br /> | ||
- | - CVM-SI<br /> | ||
- | - Implemented interpolation scheme suggested by En-Jui<br /> | ||
- | - Created 1D velocity profiles of this scheme<br /> | ||
- | - Results look good. Posted them to wiki<br /> | ||
- | - CVM-HSMB<br /> | ||
- | - Generated slices of region Andreas suggest bulk of changes were in<br /> | ||
- | - Some minor differences but overall very minimal<br /> | ||
- | - 41 out of probably 10s of thousands of data points were changed<br /> | ||
- CSDRS<br /> | |||
- Continued testing and implementing hazard curve generation<br /> | |||
- Discovered an issue where I think some of the CS2.2 curves didn't generate<br /> | |||
== Today == | == Today == | ||
Revision as of 18:57, 6 June 2013
Yesterday
- Revisited status of CVMs
- CVM-SI
- Implemented interpolation scheme suggested by En-Jui
- Created 1D velocity profiles of this scheme
- Results look good. Posted them to wiki
- CVM-HSMB
- Generated slices of region Andreas suggest bulk of changes were in
- Some minor differences but overall very minimal
- 41 out of probably 10s of thousands of data points were changed
- CSDRS
- Continued testing and implementing hazard curve generation
- Discovered an issue where I think some of the CS2.2 curves didn't generate
Today
- CSDRS site
- Test sites and also test selection of SA periods
- Means hazard curve generation should be good to go
- CVM-SI21
- Get new data files into CVM-SI
- Implement Vs1000 interpolation scheme
- CVM-HSMB
- Generate magnified maps of region
- See if any differences arise
Blocked
- No
Followups
- No
