Staff Priorities - Scott: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:15, 25 April 2014

Email Tom comparison curves
Email Tom and Feng that insertion of 2s is complete
Try genslip-v3.3.1b
- Compare to previous results
- Compare API and stand-alone results
Profile rupture generation code
Get timing data with rupture variation generator to Yifeng
Run test to see if locality matters

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Yesterday ==
-*Summer School call
+*Checked FFTW version of rupture generator for similarity of results - seems ok
-*CyberShake calls
+*Generated comparison curves for May 12 meeting
-*May 12 call
+*Tried genslip-v3.3.1b, got confused about results, emailed Rob
-*Started inserting 2s PSA values into DB from Study 14.2 as requested by Tom
+*Queued USC with ERF 36, genslip-v3.3.1a
-*Plotted comparison curves of 200m v 1000m TEST site, presented at call
 == Today ==
-*Email 200m v 1000m curves to the group
+*Email Tom comparison curves
-*Email Tom when insertion of 2s is complete
+*Email Tom and Feng that insertion of 2s is complete
-*Email Rob, suggesting we try uniformly distributed hypocenters in rupture variation
+*Try genslip-v3.3.1b
-*Generate comparison curves for May 12 sites from Study 14.2, all 3 velocity models, 3 and 5 sec
+**Compare to previous results
-*Check FFTW version of rupture generator for similarity of results
+**Compare API and stand-alone results
+*Profile rupture generation code
 *Get timing data with rupture variation generator to Yifeng
 *Run test to see if locality matters
@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 == Follow-ups ==
-*BBP code review at 1:30
+*No