Staff Priorities - Kevin: Difference between revisions
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
6/ | 6/16/15 | ||
== Yesterday: == | == Yesterday: == | ||
* | * responded to ETAS questions from Feng | ||
* | * GMPE UCERF3 vs UCERF2 MCEr calculations for CyberShake region | ||
* | * worked on moving CyberShake OEF results to Study 15.4 | ||
* | * worked on CyberShake tapered hypocenter distribution maps | ||
== Today: == | == Today: == | ||
* | * read through latest OAF tool document and follow up with Ned | ||
* more UCERF3/UCERF2 comparisons for CyberShake area - full hazard maps and maybe disaggs | |||
* | * Cybershake OEF work for IUGG talk | ||
* | |||
== Blocked: == | == Blocked: == | ||
| Line 17: | Line 16: | ||
== Followups: == | == Followups: == | ||
Ned on OAF tool | |||
Revision as of 17:23, 16 June 2015
6/16/15
Yesterday:
- responded to ETAS questions from Feng
- GMPE UCERF3 vs UCERF2 MCEr calculations for CyberShake region
- worked on moving CyberShake OEF results to Study 15.4
- worked on CyberShake tapered hypocenter distribution maps
Today:
- read through latest OAF tool document and follow up with Ned
- more UCERF3/UCERF2 comparisons for CyberShake area - full hazard maps and maybe disaggs
- Cybershake OEF work for IUGG talk
Blocked:
no
Followups:
Ned on OAF tool
Lower priority or longer term tasks
- Fill in missing site/rupture distances in CyberShake DB for ERF 36 (200m)
- Compute maps with tapered CyberShake rupture variation distribution
