Staff Priorities - Kevin: Difference between revisions
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
8/ | 8/28/15 | ||
== Yesterday: == | == Yesterday: == | ||
* ETAS work: | * ETAS work: | ||
** | ** added automatic metadata generation/parsing to ETAS code | ||
** | ** improved distance decay plots | ||
** | ** plots for M7 poisson case to show why it's unrealistic | ||
** | ** fixed catalog duration issues in plot code | ||
== Today: == | == Today: == | ||
* ETAS work: | * ETAS work: | ||
** more plot updates for Ned | |||
** map historical earthquakes to UCERF3 ruptures in order to run ETAS simulations of aftershock sequences | ** map historical earthquakes to UCERF3 ruptures in order to run ETAS simulations of aftershock sequences | ||
** modify ETAS simulation code to work with arbitrary start time (e.g. right after occurrence of historical EQ) | ** modify ETAS simulation code to work with arbitrary start time (e.g. right after occurrence of historical EQ) | ||
* get Kioumars' simplified site amplification prototype working to use as test case against my implementation | * get Kioumars' simplified site amplification prototype working to use as test case against my implementation | ||
Revision as of 16:55, 28 August 2015
8/28/15
Yesterday:
- ETAS work:
- added automatic metadata generation/parsing to ETAS code
- improved distance decay plots
- plots for M7 poisson case to show why it's unrealistic
- fixed catalog duration issues in plot code
Today:
- ETAS work:
- more plot updates for Ned
- map historical earthquakes to UCERF3 ruptures in order to run ETAS simulations of aftershock sequences
- modify ETAS simulation code to work with arbitrary start time (e.g. right after occurrence of historical EQ)
- get Kioumars' simplified site amplification prototype working to use as test case against my implementation
Blocked:
no
Followups:
no
Lower priority or longer term tasks
- Fill in missing site/rupture distances in CyberShake DB for ERF 36 (200m)