Staff Priorities - Kevin: Difference between revisions
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
10/ | 10/26/15 | ||
== Yesterday: == | == Yesterday: == | ||
* Powell | * Powell center meeting followups | ||
** added cumulative number of earthquakes plots to Operational Aftershock Forecasting app | |||
** exposed possible bug in R&J calculation, worked with Nocholas to validate implementation, ball now in his court | |||
** new EATS plots: % of runs with at a least one rupture above threshold | |||
== Today: == | == Today: == | ||
* Powell center meeting followups | * Powell center meeting followups | ||
** plot format updates for OAF app | ** plot format updates for OAF app | ||
** | ** OAF application documentation | ||
* possible bay area calculations for David Shwartz | |||
* respond with information on 85% calculation | |||
* look into ShakeMap calculation request | * look into ShakeMap calculation request | ||
Revision as of 17:07, 26 October 2015
10/26/15
Yesterday:
- Powell center meeting followups
- added cumulative number of earthquakes plots to Operational Aftershock Forecasting app
- exposed possible bug in R&J calculation, worked with Nocholas to validate implementation, ball now in his court
- new EATS plots: % of runs with at a least one rupture above threshold
Today:
- Powell center meeting followups
- plot format updates for OAF app
- OAF application documentation
- possible bay area calculations for David Shwartz
- respond with information on 85% calculation
- look into ShakeMap calculation request
Blocked:
no
Followups:
no
Lower priority or longer term tasks
- Fill in missing site/rupture distances in CyberShake DB for ERF 36 (200m)
- finish mapping of historical earthquakes to UCERF3 ruptures in order to run ETAS simulations of aftershock sequences
