CSEP Minutes 05-15-2019: Difference between revisions
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
- |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Italian OEF | Italian OEF | ||
* Operational, but only available to civil protection. | |||
* Working on publicly available system, but needs work with different levels of society. | |||
Overlapping Windows | Overlapping Windows | ||
* Using simulation-based tests the correlations are preserved so can compute cumulative statistics. | |||
* Testing all of the windows at once. | |||
* Simulated likelihood distribution based on set of parameters within each forecast window. | |||
* Compute likelihoods within each simulated distribution. | |||
* Aggregate log-likelihoods from likelihood distribution. | |||
* Worth investigating meteorology literature for their solutions. | |||
* Separating testing windows useful for understanding model performance but not required mathematically. | |||
'''Relevant questions:''' | '''Relevant questions:''' | ||
How well can you predict the number of earthquakes immediately after an event versus at some time after an event? | How well can you predict the number of earthquakes immediately after an event versus at some time after an event? | ||
When do forecasts start becoming useful after a large earthquake? | When do forecasts start becoming useful after a large earthquake? | ||
Revision as of 19:33, 15 May 2019
Italian OEF
- Operational, but only available to civil protection.
- Working on publicly available system, but needs work with different levels of society.
Overlapping Windows
- Using simulation-based tests the correlations are preserved so can compute cumulative statistics.
- Testing all of the windows at once.
- Simulated likelihood distribution based on set of parameters within each forecast window.
- Compute likelihoods within each simulated distribution.
- Aggregate log-likelihoods from likelihood distribution.
- Worth investigating meteorology literature for their solutions.
- Separating testing windows useful for understanding model performance but not required mathematically.
Relevant questions: How well can you predict the number of earthquakes immediately after an event versus at some time after an event? When do forecasts start becoming useful after a large earthquake?
