BBP Validation 2020: Difference between revisions
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== | == Intro == | ||
We discussed the following focus areas to consider for 2020 | We discussed the following focus areas to consider for 2020 | ||
| Line 11: | Line 9: | ||
*** Rupture velocity | *** Rupture velocity | ||
*** Dip | *** Dip | ||
*** Moment-rate (using duration) | |||
* Evaluate simulations for other metrics | |||
** Validation metrics that already exists (duration, inter-frequency correlation, Anderson GOF, etc.)? | |||
** New validation metrics? | |||
* Group validation of RidgeCrest Earthquake Sequence | |||
== Group validation of RidgeCrest Earthquake Sequence == | |||
New velocity model: | |||
Revision as of 22:13, 25 March 2020
Intro
We discussed the following focus areas to consider for 2020
- Evaluate source variability and parameters space sensitivity
- Will require more than 50 realizations maybe 200?
- Focus in-close where path effects are not controlling the results (within 1 fault length)
- M-A
- Area changes (DDW only?)
- Rupture velocity
- Dip
- Moment-rate (using duration)
- Evaluate simulations for other metrics
- Validation metrics that already exists (duration, inter-frequency correlation, Anderson GOF, etc.)?
- New validation metrics?
- Group validation of RidgeCrest Earthquake Sequence
Group validation of RidgeCrest Earthquake Sequence
New velocity model:
