CyberShake Reference Results: Difference between revisions

From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Scottcal (talk | contribs)
Created page with "This page is to document the current set of reference results, when verifying CyberShake on new platforms, or quantifying the impact of a change. == Current References == Th..."
 
Scottcal (talk | contribs)
 
Line 14: Line 14:
*h_frac = 0.25
*h_frac = 0.25
*Boundary layer = 80 grid points
*Boundary layer = 80 grid points
*FP = 0.5 <b>note that this has been updated since this verification was performed</b>
*FP = 0.5 <b>note that this has been updated to 1.0 since this verification was performed</b>
*Velocity insertion of impulse.
*Velocity insertion of impulse.
*SGT dt = 0.005s, nt=40000
*SGT dt = 0.005s, nt=40000
*Seismogram dt = 0.05s, nt=10000
*Seismogram dt = 0.05s, nt=10000

Latest revision as of 23:56, 10 February 2022

This page is to document the current set of reference results, when verifying CyberShake on new platforms, or quantifying the impact of a change.

Current References

The current set of reference results is for site USC, run ID 7580. These results are available on /hpss/prod/geo112/proj-shared/CyberShake/USC_Run_7580_Verification .

These results were generated with the following parameters (same as the Study 21.12 tagged code version):

  • 1 Hz
  • ERF_ID 36 (UCERF 2)
  • GP v5.4.2 rupture generator (Rup Var Scenario ID = 9)
  • Modelbox padding = 50 km
  • Depth = 50 km
  • CVM-S4.26.M01 velocity model
  • h_frac = 0.25
  • Boundary layer = 80 grid points
  • FP = 0.5 note that this has been updated to 1.0 since this verification was performed
  • Velocity insertion of impulse.
  • SGT dt = 0.005s, nt=40000
  • Seismogram dt = 0.05s, nt=10000