Staff Priorities - Fabio: Difference between revisions

From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Fsilva (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Fsilva (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== Yesterday: ==
== Yesterday: ==
* Investigated SDSU validation run results
* Investigated SDSU validation run results
** Replicated Rumi's results using same station list
** Looked at how urs_gof module uses the station list to plot GOF
** Results not better removing site response and/or using URS's 3D LF option
* Followed Kim's suggestion and used SDSU's 3D module for LF
* Met with Feng to discuss what NGA models he has/how to integrate with Broadband
** 11.2.3 plot improves significantly with 22 stations
** trunk plot matches 11.2.3 with 22 stations
** trunk plot with all stations looks very good
* Validated John's Fling study scenario 140 runs against the ones Phil ran at HPCC
** Identical bbp files
* Looked at how the files in the plot directory are used by the platform
* Integrated Phil's change into trunk
* Integrated Phil's change into trunk
** Need a workaround for both cases (with and without site response)
** Need a workaround for both cases (with and without site response)
Line 10: Line 18:


== Today: ==
== Today: ==
* Continue investigating SDSU case
* Call with Ronnie and Katie about Fling Study
** Figure out which/how many stations go into the urs_gof program
* For SDSU testing, figure out from where the site amplification module gets the reference velocity
* Make trunk work both with and without site response
* Trak #95 (wiki updating)
 
== Ongoing: ==
* Look for ways to break up the GF directory layout, some ideas are:
* Look for ways to break up the GF directory layout, some ideas are:
** First candidate is removing the plot directory from the GF directory
** First candidate is removing the plot directory from the GF directory
** Create separate validation package
** Create separate validation package
** Separate events and codebases from each other  
** Separate events and codebases from each other  
* Get ready to run Fling Study scenarios on HPCC when Phil's runs end


== Blocked: ==
== Blocked: ==
Line 22: Line 33:


== Followups: ==
== Followups: ==
* No
* Fling Study call with Ronnie, Katie, Feng, Phil @ 10:30am
* Meeting with John Yu to understand how to run Fling Study scenarios locally

Revision as of 16:36, 24 May 2012

Yesterday:

  • Investigated SDSU validation run results
    • Looked at how urs_gof module uses the station list to plot GOF
  • Followed Kim's suggestion and used SDSU's 3D module for LF
    • 11.2.3 plot improves significantly with 22 stations
    • trunk plot matches 11.2.3 with 22 stations
    • trunk plot with all stations looks very good
  • Validated John's Fling study scenario 140 runs against the ones Phil ran at HPCC
    • Identical bbp files
  • Looked at how the files in the plot directory are used by the platform
  • Integrated Phil's change into trunk
    • Need a workaround for both cases (with and without site response)
  • Python code reworking
    • Enabled $Id$ svn prop for all Python modules

Today:

  • Call with Ronnie and Katie about Fling Study
  • For SDSU testing, figure out from where the site amplification module gets the reference velocity
  • Make trunk work both with and without site response
  • Trak #95 (wiki updating)

Ongoing:

  • Look for ways to break up the GF directory layout, some ideas are:
    • First candidate is removing the plot directory from the GF directory
    • Create separate validation package
    • Separate events and codebases from each other

Blocked:

  • No

Followups:

  • Fling Study call with Ronnie, Katie, Feng, Phil @ 10:30am
  • Meeting with John Yu to understand how to run Fling Study scenarios locally