Staff Priorities - Fabio: Difference between revisions

From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Fsilva (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Fsilva (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== Yesterday: ==
== Yesterday: ==
* Investigated SDSU validation run results
* Call with Ronnie and Katie about Fling Study
** Looked at how urs_gof module uses the station list to plot GOF
** Ronnie will make changes to station lists, then we are good to go
* Followed Kim's suggestion and used SDSU's 3D module for LF
* Reproduced Rumi's results using 11.2.3 and her scenarios
** 11.2.3 plot improves significantly with 22 stations
** Results do not look good when using URS codebase for LF
** trunk plot matches 11.2.3 with 22 stations
* Initial analysis of space and time requirements for running Fling Study
** trunk plot with all stations looks very good
** Short summary: 1.7Tb and about 3 months :-(!
* Validated John's Fling study scenario 140 runs against the ones Phil ran at HPCC
** Identical bbp files
* Looked at how the files in the plot directory are used by the platform
   
   
== Today: ==
== Today: ==
* Call with Ronnie and Katie about Fling Study
 
* For SDSU testing, figure out from where the site amplification module gets the reference velocity
* Organize Fling Study information on the wiki, create progress tables
** Trac #95 (wiki updating)
* Test HPCC setup with Fling Study scenario 101 and compare result to Phil's run
* Meet with Phil and John Yu wrt Fling Study strategy
* Make trunk work both with and without site response
* Make trunk work both with and without site response
* Trac #95 (wiki updating)
* Meeting with John Yu to understand how to run Fling Study scenarios locally


== Ongoing: ==  
== Ongoing: ==  
Line 27: Line 25:


== Followups: ==
== Followups: ==
* Call with Ronnie, Katie, Feng, Phil @ 10:30am
* Meeting with John Yu and Phil @ TBD
* Meeting with John Yu @ TBD

Revision as of 17:04, 25 May 2012

Yesterday:

  • Call with Ronnie and Katie about Fling Study
    • Ronnie will make changes to station lists, then we are good to go
  • Reproduced Rumi's results using 11.2.3 and her scenarios
    • Results do not look good when using URS codebase for LF
  • Initial analysis of space and time requirements for running Fling Study
    • Short summary: 1.7Tb and about 3 months :-(!

Today:

  • Organize Fling Study information on the wiki, create progress tables
    • Trac #95 (wiki updating)
  • Test HPCC setup with Fling Study scenario 101 and compare result to Phil's run
  • Meet with Phil and John Yu wrt Fling Study strategy
  • Make trunk work both with and without site response

Ongoing:

  • Look for ways to break up the GF directory layout, some ideas are:
    • First candidate is removing the plot directory from the GF directory
    • Create separate validation package
    • Separate events and codebases from each other

Blocked:

  • No

Followups:

  • Meeting with John Yu and Phil @ TBD