Staff Priorities - Fabio: Difference between revisions

From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
Fsilva (talk | contribs)
1,730 edits
No edit summary
Fsilva (talk | contribs)
1,730 edits
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== Yesterday: ==
== Yesterday: ==


* Updated Trac site with new activities
* Compare RK's data files with the ones we get in order to figure out why boxplots are different
* Checked the hypocenter randomization code into svn
** Found discrepancy, but our results are correct
** Also added option to disable randomization
* Tested newer changes to FW's GMPE code
* Got RK's raw files for the December M6.3 scenarios
* Ran ExSim outside BB Platform, compare results with KA's
* Generated raw files using new scripts for same scenario
** Found minor rounding differences
* Received ExSim module from Karen with sample LOMAP inputs and outputs
** Set up meeting with CG and KA to discuss ExSim platform integration
* Generated 12 GMPE validation packages
* Resolved issue about different srf plots for SoCal and NoCal
** M6.2SS, M6.6SS, M6.6RV, 20km and 50km, SoCal and NoCal
* Ran SoCal and NoCal M6.2SS on broadband
** Looks promising
** Ruptures similar but not identical (unexpected!)


== Today: ==
== Today: ==


* Compare RK's data files with the ones we get in order to figure out why boxplots are different
* SVN commits
* Test newer changes to FW's GMPE code, check into BBP svn
** gmpe_box_plot scripts
** GMPE code
* Discussion on ExSim integration
* Add version numbers on validation packages and GFs
* Add version numbers on validation packages and GFs
* Incorporate JC's changes to the UCSB rupture generator
* Incorporate JC's changes to the UCSB rupture generator
** Use only 1 rupture generator for vertical and dipping faults
** Use only 1 rupture generator for vertical and dipping faults
* Run ExSim outside BB Platform, compare results with KA's
** Set up meeting with CG and KA to discuss ExSim platform integration


== Blocked: ==
== Blocked: ==
Line 27: Line 23:


== Followups: ==
== Followups: ==
* Cybershake call @ 11am
* ExSim call @ 10:30am

Revision as of 18:09, 24 January 2013

Yesterday:

  • Compare RK's data files with the ones we get in order to figure out why boxplots are different
    • Found discrepancy, but our results are correct
  • Tested newer changes to FW's GMPE code
  • Ran ExSim outside BB Platform, compare results with KA's
    • Found minor rounding differences
    • Set up meeting with CG and KA to discuss ExSim platform integration
  • Resolved issue about different srf plots for SoCal and NoCal

Today:

  • SVN commits
    • gmpe_box_plot scripts
    • GMPE code
  • Discussion on ExSim integration
  • Add version numbers on validation packages and GFs
  • Incorporate JC's changes to the UCSB rupture generator
    • Use only 1 rupture generator for vertical and dipping faults

Blocked:

  • No

Followups:

  • ExSim call @ 10:30am
Retrieved from "https://strike.scec.org/index.php?title=Staff_Priorities_-_Fabio&oldid=6405"