CyberShake PBR Study: Difference between revisions
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This CyberShake Precarious Balanced Rock Study will evaluate whether CyberShake ground motions are likely to knock over known Precarious Rocks | This CyberShake Precarious Balanced Rock Study will evaluate whether CyberShake ground motions are likely to knock over known Precarious Rocks | ||
== Inputs to calculation == | |||
*Site | |||
**List of Src/* | |||
**List of Src/Rup/* | |||
**List of Src/Rup/Var | |||
== PBR Site == | == PBR Site == | ||
Revision as of 19:03, 8 March 2013
This CyberShake Precarious Balanced Rock Study will evaluate whether CyberShake ground motions are likely to knock over known Precarious Rocks
Inputs to calculation
- Site
- List of Src/*
- List of Src/Rup/*
- List of Src/Rup/Var
PBR Site
We will begin by working with CyberShake 1.0 map data.
Low Freq seismograms
- PERRIS
- Lat/Long
- Nearby Faults:
- Fault Name:
- Src/Rupture Number:
- Number of rupture variations:
- Fault Parallel (degree's off North)
Broadband seismograms
- PERRIS
- Lat/Long
- Nearby Faults:
- Fault Name:
- Src/Rupture Number:
- Number of rupture variations:
- Fault Parallel (degree's off North)
Steps
- ask sc what code to calculate peak amps
- define output format schema
- implement in db and table in sqllite
- write test
- Find location of Perris PBR
- Find nearest src/rupture
- Estimate Rotation Angle of each fault