Difference between revisions of "CISM Evaluation Metrics"
(Created page with "List of metrics/regression tests for all catalogs as a way to compare them, ensure that RSQSim is behaving the same on different machines, and to compare/validate results from...") |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* Magnitude-Frequency distribution | * Magnitude-Frequency distribution | ||
** Whole-system | ** Whole-system | ||
| − | *** [http://opensha.usc.edu/ftp/kmilner/ucerf3/2013_05_10-ucerf3p3-production-10runs/fss_mfd_plots/2013_05_10-ucerf3p3-production-10runs_COMPOUND_SOL_MFD_RELM_TESTING_Region.pdf UCERF3 example] | + | *** [http://opensha.usc.edu/ftp/kmilner/ucerf3/2013_05_10-ucerf3p3-production-10runs/fss_mfd_plots/2013_05_10-ucerf3p3-production-10runs_COMPOUND_SOL_MFD_RELM_TESTING_Region.pdf UCERF3 example]: Gray is off fault and on fault sub-seismogenic, Blue is on fault supra-seismogenic, Red is total |
** Region- and fault-specific (for more complex models) | ** Region- and fault-specific (for more complex models) | ||
| − | + | *** [http://opensha.usc.edu/ftp/kmilner/ucerf3/2013_05_10-ucerf3p3-production-10runs/parent_sect_mfds/participation_cumulative/ UCERF3 fault participation MFD examples] | |
| − | + | * Inter-event time and distance distributions | |
| − | + | * Scaling relations | |
| − | + | ** Magnitude-area | |
| − | + | ** Slip-area | |
| − | + | ** Stress drop - magnitude | |
| − | + | * Rupture speed | |
| + | * Recurrence time distributions for event sets of interest | ||
Most of these are already in plotEqs(), one of the RSQSim post-processing functions that Keith includes with RSQSim, but we probably want to do regional tests that focus on particular sites or faults as well. | Most of these are already in plotEqs(), one of the RSQSim post-processing functions that Keith includes with RSQSim, but we probably want to do regional tests that focus on particular sites or faults as well. | ||
Revision as of 16:56, 13 April 2016
List of metrics/regression tests for all catalogs as a way to compare them, ensure that RSQSim is behaving the same on different machines, and to compare/validate results from updated versions of RSQSim:
- Magnitude-Frequency distribution
- Whole-system
- UCERF3 example: Gray is off fault and on fault sub-seismogenic, Blue is on fault supra-seismogenic, Red is total
- Region- and fault-specific (for more complex models)
- Whole-system
- Inter-event time and distance distributions
- Scaling relations
- Magnitude-area
- Slip-area
- Stress drop - magnitude
- Rupture speed
- Recurrence time distributions for event sets of interest
Most of these are already in plotEqs(), one of the RSQSim post-processing functions that Keith includes with RSQSim, but we probably want to do regional tests that focus on particular sites or faults as well. We should create a new function or package of them, similar to plotEqs() that does all the tests and reports/plots the results.
Additional tests and ways of comparing RSQSim catalogs, to both simulated and real data:
We also want some measure of the divergence of these catalogs when small changes are made to the parameters, as well as the number of cores the simulations are run on. o Lyapunov exponent Set up a reference rupture set or catalog. Compare regional RSQSim MFD’s to UCERF3’s on-fault MFD’s.
