Difference between revisions of "UCVM Density Formula"
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
== Compare CCA06, CVM-S4.26 and CenCal Density to Nafe Drake Vp Density Relationship == | == Compare CCA06, CVM-S4.26 and CenCal Density to Nafe Drake Vp Density Relationship == | ||
| − | + | UCVM also provides an algorithm that defines a scaling relationship between Vp values and density values on a nafe drake density relationship. These plots show density values for selected points extracted from cvm-s4.26, cca06, and cencal, and cvm-h. | |
{| | {| | ||
| [[File:cca_rho_versus_vp_density_1000km.png|thumb|400px| CCA Density (rho) at Depth 1000m (Density in g/cm^3)]] | | [[File:cca_rho_versus_vp_density_1000km.png|thumb|400px| CCA Density (rho) at Depth 1000m (Density in g/cm^3)]] | ||
| [[File:cvms5_rho_versus_vp_density_1000km.png|thumb|400px|CVM-S4.26 Density (rho) at Depth 1000m (Density in g/cm^3)]] | | [[File:cvms5_rho_versus_vp_density_1000km.png|thumb|400px|CVM-S4.26 Density (rho) at Depth 1000m (Density in g/cm^3)]] | ||
| [[File:cencal_rho_versus_vp_density_1000km.png|thumb|400px|Cencal Density (rho) at Depth 1000m]] | | [[File:cencal_rho_versus_vp_density_1000km.png|thumb|400px|Cencal Density (rho) at Depth 1000m]] | ||
| + | | [[File:cvmh_rho_versus_vp_density_1000km.png|thumb|400px|CVM-H Density (rho) at Depth 1000m]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 45: | Line 46: | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
| − | == Vp-based Density Formula | + | == Vp-based Density Formula in UCVM == |
<pre> | <pre> | ||
# Density derived from Vp via Nafe-Drake curve, Brocher (2005) eqn 1. */ | # Density derived from Vp via Nafe-Drake curve, Brocher (2005) eqn 1. */ | ||
Revision as of 21:21, 27 May 2018
We have reviewed how the density values are calculated in our tomography improved velocity models. We have determined that CVM-S4.26 calculated density from model Vs, and CCA06 provides density values in a data file. We reviewed algorithms to confirm that the same algorith is used to calculated density for both CVM-S4.6 and CCA06.
Contents
Compare CCA06, CVM-S4.26 and CenCal Density to Nafe Drake Vs Density Relationship
If model uses the formula, we'd expect values to fall on a diagonal line in these plots.
Looks like CCA06 and CVM-S4.26 use this Vs-based density scaling relationship, but CenCal does not.
Compare CCA06, CVM-S4.26 and CenCal Density to Nafe Drake Vp Density Relationship
UCVM also provides an algorithm that defines a scaling relationship between Vp values and density values on a nafe drake density relationship. These plots show density values for selected points extracted from cvm-s4.26, cca06, and cencal, and cvm-h.
Vs-based Density Formula used in CVM-S4.26 and CCA06
# # * Calculates the density based off of Vs. Based on Nafe-Drake scaling relationship. # * # * @param vs The Vs value off which to scale. # * @return Density, in g/m^3. # */ def vs_2_density(vs): # Density scaling parameters p5 = -0.0024189659303912917 p4 = 0.015600987888334450 p3 = 0.051962399479341816 p2 = -0.51231936640441489 p1 = 1.2550758337054457 p0 = 1.2948318548300342 retVal = 0.0 vs = vs / 1000.0 retVal = p0 + p1 * vs + p2 * pow(vs, 2) + p3 * pow(vs, 3) + p4 * pow(vs, 4) + p5 * pow(vs, 5) retVal = retVal * 1000 return retVal
Vp-based Density Formula in UCVM
# Density derived from Vp via Nafe-Drake curve, Brocher (2005) eqn 1. */
def vp_2_density(vp):
# Convert m to km
vp = vp * 0.001
rho = vp * (1.6612 - vp * (0.4721 - vp * (0.0671 - vp * (0.0043 - vp * 0.000106))))
if (rho < 1.0):
rho = 1.0
rho = rho * 1000.0;
return
