Difference between revisions of "CSEP Minutes 06-06-2018"

From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
'''CSEP1 Data set''' <br>
 
'''CSEP1 Data set''' <br>
* should focus on models that are most interesting.
+
* should focus on models that are most interesting. what constitutes an interesting model?
** send e-mail to modelers about the scientific questions that are hoped to be learned, and what could be publishable.
+
** send e-mail to modelers about the scientific questions that are hoped to be learned, and what could be publishable about improving our understanding of the earthquake process
** valuation of models based on elaborate vs. simple models
+
** valuation of models elaborate vs. simple models
** spatial etas computational efficiency and stable parameterization
+
** spatial etas computational efficiency and stable parameterization from usgs perspective
** if more simple models were more straight forward to the reader
+
** if models were simpler, they would be more straight forward to the reader
 +
* important to prioritize valuable results due to limited developer/human resources
 
* list of references/abstract describing the models in CSEP1. send email to models that have models installed in CSEP.
 
* list of references/abstract describing the models in CSEP1. send email to models that have models installed in CSEP.
 
* M. Werner and D. Schorlemmer expert on different models
 
* M. Werner and D. Schorlemmer expert on different models

Latest revision as of 22:43, 6 June 2018

CSEP Working Group Home Page

Participants: D. Jackson; J. Gilchrist; J. Vidale; D. Rhoades; A. Michael and W. Savran

Minutes

Leadership Retreat

  • Ned presentation on the future of CSEP, same information that has been presented before.
  • Moving workshop around the time of SCEC annual meeting

CSEP1 Data set

  • should focus on models that are most interesting. what constitutes an interesting model?
    • send e-mail to modelers about the scientific questions that are hoped to be learned, and what could be publishable about improving our understanding of the earthquake process
    • valuation of models elaborate vs. simple models
    • spatial etas computational efficiency and stable parameterization from usgs perspective
    • if models were simpler, they would be more straight forward to the reader
  • important to prioritize valuable results due to limited developer/human resources
  • list of references/abstract describing the models in CSEP1. send email to models that have models installed in CSEP.
  • M. Werner and D. Schorlemmer expert on different models