Difference between revisions of "CSEP 2.0 Developments"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search (Wsavran moved page CSEP 1 Parallel Reprocessing to CSEP 1 Status) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | [[CSEP_Working_Group|CSEP Working Group Home Page]]<br> | |
| + | __TOC__ | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Proposed software developments needed to test UCERF3 -- CSEP2.0 as a workflow == | ||
| + | * abstract goes here. | ||
| + | * summary statement of proposal | ||
| + | * clearly state proposed plans for putting ucerf3 under test | ||
| + | * [under development until remainder of proposal is written] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Introduction == | ||
| + | * state reasons for transitioning from CSEP1 -> CSEP2 | ||
| + | * introduce technical/scientific challenges of testing UCERF3 etas | ||
| + | * introduce the csep problem as a workflow | ||
| + | * describe remaining software infrastructure | ||
| + | * 'on-demand' prospective/retrospective experiments | ||
| + | |||
| + | ; Guiding Principals | ||
| + | # Controlled Environment | ||
| + | # Transparency | ||
| + | # Comparability | ||
| + | # Reproducibility | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Testing the Next Generation of Earthquake Forecasts == | ||
| + | * cover technical/scientific challenges of testing UCERF3 etas | ||
| + | * fault and stochastic event sets | ||
| + | * potential models under forecast | ||
| + | * make point that software developments are required to test CSEP2.0 | ||
| + | ** software developments | ||
| + | ** first step to evaluation forecast is to compute forecasts | ||
| + | |||
| + | == CSEP2.0 as a Workflow == | ||
| + | * proposed software and hardware to test CSEP2.0 | ||
| + | * describe tech used to achieve guiding principals | ||
| + | ** controlled environment -> containers | ||
| + | ** transparency -> web application (results viewer) | ||
| + | ** comparability -> (open sourced evaluations) | ||
| + | ** reproducibility -> containers and workflow | ||
| + | * decoupling of forecasts and evaluations | ||
| + | * proposal to open-source experiments to community | ||
| + | * versioning of catalog data | ||
| + | * introduce the minimum viable product to run Open-SHA from container in pegasus | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Proposed scientific questions for testing new Forecasting models == | ||
| + | * do faults provide improved forecasting skill? | ||
| + | * retrospective experiements for past earthquakes | ||
| + | ** el mayor cucupah | ||
| + | ** landers | ||
| + | ** napa valley | ||
| + | ** northridge (unknown fault... hinterlands) | ||
| + | * simple versus complex models | ||
| + | * comparison against csep1 simulations (use case for csep1 dataset) | ||
| + | ** need method for comparing rate based forecasts and fault-based simulation based forecasts | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Roadmap toward testing UCERF3 == | ||
| + | * describe specific steps required for testing UCERF3 | ||
| + | * essentially, previous sections written as actionable statements from previous section | ||
| + | * include timeline | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Conclusion == | ||
| + | * wrap up proposal with brief paragraph reiterating main points | ||
Latest revision as of 23:37, 28 June 2018
Contents
Proposed software developments needed to test UCERF3 -- CSEP2.0 as a workflow
- abstract goes here.
- summary statement of proposal
- clearly state proposed plans for putting ucerf3 under test
- [under development until remainder of proposal is written]
Introduction
- state reasons for transitioning from CSEP1 -> CSEP2
- introduce technical/scientific challenges of testing UCERF3 etas
- introduce the csep problem as a workflow
- describe remaining software infrastructure
- 'on-demand' prospective/retrospective experiments
- Guiding Principals
- Controlled Environment
- Transparency
- Comparability
- Reproducibility
Testing the Next Generation of Earthquake Forecasts
- cover technical/scientific challenges of testing UCERF3 etas
- fault and stochastic event sets
- potential models under forecast
- make point that software developments are required to test CSEP2.0
- software developments
- first step to evaluation forecast is to compute forecasts
CSEP2.0 as a Workflow
- proposed software and hardware to test CSEP2.0
- describe tech used to achieve guiding principals
- controlled environment -> containers
- transparency -> web application (results viewer)
- comparability -> (open sourced evaluations)
- reproducibility -> containers and workflow
- decoupling of forecasts and evaluations
- proposal to open-source experiments to community
- versioning of catalog data
- introduce the minimum viable product to run Open-SHA from container in pegasus
Proposed scientific questions for testing new Forecasting models
- do faults provide improved forecasting skill?
- retrospective experiements for past earthquakes
- el mayor cucupah
- landers
- napa valley
- northridge (unknown fault... hinterlands)
- simple versus complex models
- comparison against csep1 simulations (use case for csep1 dataset)
- need method for comparing rate based forecasts and fault-based simulation based forecasts
Roadmap toward testing UCERF3
- describe specific steps required for testing UCERF3
- essentially, previous sections written as actionable statements from previous section
- include timeline
Conclusion
- wrap up proposal with brief paragraph reiterating main points
