Difference between revisions of "CSEP Minutes 07-25-2018"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
*** Need to agree on the basis of the software development. | *** Need to agree on the basis of the software development. | ||
| − | + | ||
<h1> Action items: </h1> | <h1> Action items: </h1> | ||
| − | + | <h2> Bill </h2> | |
* Put questionnaire responses on the wiki, if people agree to share their responses. | * Put questionnaire responses on the wiki, if people agree to share their responses. | ||
* Write proposal for technical software developments to collaborate disucssions amongst groups. | * Write proposal for technical software developments to collaborate disucssions amongst groups. | ||
| + | ** Model outputs should contain hypocenters, origin time, and moment magnitudes. | ||
| − | + | <h2> Bill & Max </h2> | |
* Scientific proposal for call next week involving modelers. | * Scientific proposal for call next week involving modelers. | ||
Latest revision as of 20:21, 25 July 2018
Participants: M. Werner, D. Rhoades, W. Savran, P. Maechling, J. Vidale, A. Michael, and D. Jackson
Contents
CSEP Workshop SCEC Annual Meeting
Planned CSEP workshop the Saturday before SCEC AM (09/08/18)
Participants
Who should we invite?
- Conveners
- Andy Michael
- Max Werner
- David Rhoades
- Toroka (sp?)
- Tom Jordan
- Participants
- USGS
- Jeanne
- Kevin
- Ned
- Nicholas
- Andrea
- New Zealand
- Matt
- SCEC
- Fabio
- John Y.
- John V.
- Bruce S.
- Jacqui G.
- Keith R.
- USGS
Workshop Topic Ideas
1) Planning CSEP2.0 (>= 50%)
- USGS Modelers
- International Representatives
- New Zealand
- Italy
- Potsdam
- Japan
- Need to account for software development across Potsdam and SCEC.
- Technical discussion at workshop.
2) CSEP1.0 Legacy issues
- Present curated CSEP1.0 data along with data set
- Data availability
- Publication Plans for CA data set
3) [DJ] Trying to integrate short-term (aftershock) forecasts between forecasting models.
- How can we answer questions across tectonic settings?
- Share questionnaires between people doing short-term forecasts.
4) [PM] Testing UCERF3-ETAS against other ETAS varities
- USGS typically forecasts 1 year.
European RISE proposal
- Several EU members planning proposal led by Stefan W.
- Proposal has the goal of advancing operational earthquake forecasting within Europe.
- Core mission is not necessarily basic science, but also not implementating OEF for Europe.
- Dozens of EU institutions, spanning seismologists to statisticians to risk communications.
- Estimating dynamic seismic risk.
- Key aspect is around earthquake forecasting.
- Another aspect is model evaluations.
- Max is the lisason between SCEC and EU Testing Centers.
- Questions:
- How do we make sure that we have a flexible system where people can design their own bespoke experiements?
- How do we internationally make sure the developments are accesssible between testing centers?
- Communication between groups.
- Need to agree on the basis of the software development.
Action items:
Bill
- Put questionnaire responses on the wiki, if people agree to share their responses.
- Write proposal for technical software developments to collaborate disucssions amongst groups.
- Model outputs should contain hypocenters, origin time, and moment magnitudes.
Bill & Max
- Scientific proposal for call next week involving modelers.
