Difference between revisions of "CSEP Minutes 08-08-2018"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
* Future of CSEP discussion (1 hour) | * Future of CSEP discussion (1 hour) | ||
* Discussions of testing ground motions and hazard model | * Discussions of testing ground motions and hazard model | ||
| + | ** Anne Marie B., D. Boatwright, | ||
| + | |||
| + | == CSEP1 Legacy == | ||
| + | * Use catalog to facilitate reprocessing (best-available) | ||
| + | * Evaluations should be included in the data set | ||
= Action Items = | = Action Items = | ||
== Bill == | == Bill == | ||
* reach out to ned about presenting u3etas testing at workshop | * reach out to ned about presenting u3etas testing at workshop | ||
Revision as of 19:55, 8 August 2018
CSEP Working Group Home Page
Participants:
Minutes
Workshop
- Highlight CSEP2 experiments (~1 hour per experiment)
- Reach out to leaders of focus groups to devise CSEP2 experiments
- Ned Field (u3etas, u3etas-nofaults)
- Jeanne/Nicholas (r&j, fastETAS)
- Dave J. (u3etas-ti and long-term forecasts)
- Bill/Phil share thoughts on CSEP2 software development and CSEP1 legacy issues
- David R. provides international New Zealand perspective
- Matt G. consider presenting on the New Zealand seismic hazard model
- Status of RSQSim for forecasting or evaluating forecasts against model data versus observations
- Bruce S. or Jacqui G.
- Tom J. will describe RSQSim and perform comparative studies against UCERF3 and discussing involving state-dependent forecasts.
- Future of CSEP discussion (1 hour)
- Discussions of testing ground motions and hazard model
- Anne Marie B., D. Boatwright,
CSEP1 Legacy
- Use catalog to facilitate reprocessing (best-available)
- Evaluations should be included in the data set
Action Items
Bill
- reach out to ned about presenting u3etas testing at workshop
