Difference between revisions of "CSEP Minutes 05-29-2019"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Participants Unknown. | Participants Unknown. | ||
| − | Missing events cause lower estimations of spontaneous ruptures. | + | * Missing events cause lower estimations of spontaneous ruptures. |
| − | How do we show there being superior predictability from a fault-based model? | + | * How do we show there being superior predictability from a fault-based model? |
| − | Mw <4.0 cannot trigger events | + | * Mw <4.0 cannot trigger events |
| − | Can we identify this issue when it happens? How can we determine a difference between a data and the model? | + | * Can we identify this issue when it happens? How can we determine a difference between a data and the model? |
| − | Completeness parameters could cause different clustering properties, and may need recalibration of their model. | + | * Completeness parameters could cause different clustering properties, and may need recalibration of their model. |
| − | Boost of ETAS models due to this issue of “slow nucleation” | + | * Boost of ETAS models due to this issue of “slow nucleation” |
Latest revision as of 19:14, 2 October 2019
Participants Unknown.
- Missing events cause lower estimations of spontaneous ruptures.
- How do we show there being superior predictability from a fault-based model?
- Mw <4.0 cannot trigger events
- Can we identify this issue when it happens? How can we determine a difference between a data and the model?
- Completeness parameters could cause different clustering properties, and may need recalibration of their model.
- Boost of ETAS models due to this issue of “slow nucleation”
