Difference between revisions of "CyberShake Study 24.1"
(26 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | CyberShake Study 24.1 is an upcoming study in Northern California which includes deterministic low-frequency (0-1 Hz) and stochastic high-frequency (1-50 Hz) simulations. We will use the [[Rupture_Variation_Generator_v5.5.2|Graves & Pitarka (2022)]] rupture generator and the high frequency modules from the SCEC Broadband Platform v22.4. | + | CyberShake Study 24.1 is an upcoming study in Northern California which includes deterministic low-frequency (0-1 Hz) and stochastic high-frequency (1-50 Hz) simulations. We will use the [[Rupture_Variation_Generator_v5.5.2|Graves & Pitarka (2022)]] rupture generator and the high frequency modules from the SCEC Broadband Platform v22.4. This study includes vertical component seismograms, period-dependent durations, and Fourier spectra IMs, and a reduction in minimum Vs to 400 m/s. |
== Status == | == Status == | ||
− | This study is in the planning phase. We hope to begin this study in | + | This study is in the planning phase. We hope to begin this study in mid-2024. |
== Data Products == | == Data Products == | ||
Line 353: | Line 353: | ||
| [[File:s3446_10000m_nosmooth_sfcvm_extended_vs.png|thumb|250px]] | | [[File:s3446_10000m_nosmooth_sfcvm_extended_vs.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | Below are vertical cross-sections. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| | ||
+ | ! Y=2400 !! Y=4800 !! Y=7200 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | [[File:s3446_x_2400_nosmooth_sfcvm_extended_vs.png|thumb|400px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3446_x_4800_nosmooth_sfcvm_extended_vs.png|thumb|400px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3446_x_7200_nosmooth_sfcvm_extended_vs.png|thumb|400px]] | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| | ||
+ | ! X=1400 !! X=2800 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | [[File:s3446_y_1400_nosmooth_sfcvm_extended_vs.png|thumb|400px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3446_y_2800_nosmooth_sfcvm_extended_vs.png|thumb|400px]] | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
==== Cross-sections, smoothing, extended SFCVM Sierra 1D background, CCA + taper ==== | ==== Cross-sections, smoothing, extended SFCVM Sierra 1D background, CCA + taper ==== | ||
Line 367: | Line 385: | ||
| [[File:s3446_4000m_smooth_sfcvm_extended_vs.png|thumb|250px]] | | [[File:s3446_4000m_smooth_sfcvm_extended_vs.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
| [[File:s3446_10000m_smooth_sfcvm_extended_vs.png|thumb|250px]] | | [[File:s3446_10000m_smooth_sfcvm_extended_vs.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | Below are vertical cross-sections. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| | ||
+ | ! Y=2400 !! Y=4800 !! Y=7200 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | [[File:s3446_x_2400_smooth_sfcvm_extended_vs.png|thumb|400px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3446_x_4800_smooth_sfcvm_extended_vs.png|thumb|400px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3446_x_7200_smooth_sfcvm_extended_vs.png|thumb|400px]] | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| | ||
+ | ! X=1400 !! X=2800 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | [[File:s3446_y_1400_smooth_sfcvm_extended_vs.png|thumb|400px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3446_y_2800_smooth_sfcvm_extended_vs.png|thumb|400px]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
==== Cross-sections, no smoothing, extended SFCVM Sierra 1D background with taper, CCA + taper ==== | ==== Cross-sections, no smoothing, extended SFCVM Sierra 1D background with taper, CCA + taper ==== | ||
− | Below are horizontal cross-sections at various depths taken from a model for s3446 generated without smoothing, with the tiling SFCVM, CCA-06 + taper, 1D representation of the Sierra foothills in SFCVM + taper. This model was extracted on 4/ | + | Below are horizontal cross-sections at various depths taken from a model for s3446 generated without smoothing, with the tiling SFCVM, CCA-06 + taper, 1D representation of the Sierra foothills in SFCVM + taper. This plot includes our typical practice of populating the surface point by querying the models at a depth of grid_spacing/4, or 20m. This model was extracted on 4/9/24. |
+ | |||
+ | {| | ||
+ | ! Surface (20m) !! 80m !! 800m !! 2000m !! 4000m !! 10000m | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | [[File:4_9 s3446_0m_nosmooth_sfcvm_extended_taper_vs.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:4_9_s3446_80m_nosmooth_sfcvm_extended_taper_vs.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:4_9_s3446_800m_nosmooth_sfcvm_extended_taper_vs.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:4_9_s3446_2000m_nosmooth_sfcvm_extended_taper_vs.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:4_9_s3446_4000m_nosmooth_sfcvm_extended_taper_vs.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:4_9_s3446_10000m_nosmooth_sfcvm_extended_taper_vs.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| | ||
+ | ! Y=2400 !! Y=4800 !! Y=7200 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | [[File:4_9_s3446_x_2400_nosmooth_vs.png|thumb|400px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:4_9_s3446_x_4800_nosmooth_vs.png|thumb|400px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:4_9_s3446_x_7200_nosmooth_vs.png|thumb|400px]] | ||
+ | |} | ||
{| | {| | ||
− | ! | + | ! X=1400 !! X=2800 |
+ | |- | ||
+ | | [[File:4_9_s3446_y_1400_nosmooth_vs.png|thumb|400px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:4_9_s3446_y_2800_nosmooth_vs.png|thumb|400px]] | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Candidate Model (RC1) === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Our candidate model is generated using (1) SFCVM with the gabbro modifications; (2) CCA-06 with the merged taper in the top 700m; (3) the [[NC1D]] model with the merged taper in the top 700m. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| | ||
+ | ! Surface (20m) !! 80m !! 800m !! 2000m !! 4000m !! 10000m | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | [[File:4_19 s3446_20m_smooth_RC1_vs.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:4_19_s3446_80m_smooth_RC1_vs.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:4_19_s3446_800m_smooth_RC1_vs.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:4_19_s3446_2000m_smooth_RC1_vs.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:4_19_s3446_4000m_smooth_RC1_vs.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:4_19_s3446_10000m_smooth_RC1_vs.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Vp/Vs Ratio Adjustment === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Our previous approach for applying the Vs floor is as follows: | ||
+ | |||
+ | #If Vs < Vs_floor (400 m/s): | ||
+ | ##Calculate the Vp/Vs ratio | ||
+ | ##Change Vs to the floor | ||
+ | ##Calculate a new Vp using Vp = Vs_floor * Vp/Vs ratio | ||
+ | #Apply Vp and density floors | ||
+ | |||
+ | However, there are some sites with very high Vp/Vs ratios near the surface where Vs is low. Therefore, if this algorithm is applied, unexpectedly high Vp values may result. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Here is a vertical profile at site s3240 (Moffett Field). You can see the high surface Vp value: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| | ||
+ | | [[File:s3240_vert_profile.png|thumb|400px]] | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | Looking in more detail, here are the Vp and Vs values in the top 90m at s3240: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| border="1" | ||
+ | ! Depth (m) !! Vp !! Vs !! Vp/Vs ratio !! Adjusted Vs !! Adjusted Vp | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 0 || 739 || 81 || 9.12 || 400 || 3649 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 10 || 1009 || 82 || 12.30 || 400 || 4922 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | <b> 20 </b> || 1309 || 84 || 15.58 || <b> 400 </b> || <b> 6233 </b> | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 30 || 1502 || 152 || 9.88 || 400 || 3953 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 40 || 1590 || 285 || 5.58 || 400 || 3649 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 50 || 1678 || 418 || 4.01 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 60 || 1711 || 436 || 3.92 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 70 || 1744 || 453 || 3.85 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | <b> 80 </b> || <b> 1776 </b> || <b> 471 </b> || 3.77 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | 90 || 1807 || 489 || 3.70 |
− | | | + | |} |
− | | | + | |
− | + | Since we are using 80m grid spacing, and populating the surface point at a depth of (grid spacing)/4 = 20m, the values at 20m and 80m are being used. The very high Vp/Vs ratio at 20m means that a very high Vp value is used. | |
− | + | ||
− | | [[File: | + | These high Vp/Vs ratios occur at a number of locations around San Francisco Bay, illustrated in the surface Vp plot below: |
+ | |||
+ | {| | ||
+ | | [[File:s3240_surface_vp.png|thumb|400px]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | To solve this problem, we will modify the process for applying the Vs floor. We will use the Vp/Vs ratio at 80m depth instead of at the surface, and use a maximum ratio of 4. A similar process was used in the HighF project. | ||
+ | |||
+ | #If Vs < Vs_floor (400 m/s): | ||
+ | ##If surface grid point: | ||
+ | ###Calculate Vp/Vs ratio at 1 grid point depth (80m) | ||
+ | ###If Vp/Vs ratio > 4: | ||
+ | ####Lower Vp/Vs ratio to 4 | ||
+ | ##Else: | ||
+ | ###Calculate Vp/Vs ratio at this grid point | ||
+ | ##New Vs = Vs_floor | ||
+ | ##New Vp = Vs * (potentially modified) Vp/Vs ratio. | ||
+ | #Apply Vp and density floors. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Strain Green Tensors == | ||
+ | |||
+ | We will use the HIP implementation of AWP-ODC-SGT, with the following parameters: | ||
+ | *Grid spacing: 80 m | ||
+ | *DT: 0.004 sec | ||
+ | *NT: 50000 timesteps by default, increased to 75000 for sites with any site-to-hypocenter distance greater than 450 km. | ||
+ | *Minimum Vs: 400 m/s | ||
+ | |||
+ | SGTs will be saved with a time decimation of 10, so every 0.04 sec. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Vertical Component == | ||
+ | |||
+ | We will include vertical (Z) component seismograms in this study. To support this, we will produce Z-component SGTs and include Z-component synthesis in the post-processing and broadband stages. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Verification that the Z component codes are working correctly is documented at [[Vertical component verification]]. | ||
== Rupture Generator == | == Rupture Generator == | ||
We will use the same version of the rupture generator that we used for Study 22.12, v5.5.2. | We will use the same version of the rupture generator that we used for Study 22.12, v5.5.2. | ||
+ | |||
+ | To match the SGT timestep, SRFs will be generated with dt=0.04s, deterministic seismograms will be output with dt=0.04s, and broadband seismograms will use dt=0.01s. | ||
== High-frequency codes == | == High-frequency codes == | ||
Line 393: | Line 541: | ||
However, since we are using a denser mesh (80m) and a lower minimum Vs (400 m/s), we will not apply site correction to the low-frequency seismograms before combining. Rob states, <i>You may recall that there is a klugy process we have used to estimate the Vref value based on the Vsmin and grid spacing of the model. But, it has only been applied for the case of h=100 m and Vsmin=500 m/s. What I found here is that estimating Vref using the 80m & 400m/s model is that Vref is almost always less than Vs30 (i.e., Vsite). This means that when the site adjustment is applied, the motions are deamplified. This is why we see such a poor fit for the 3D case when using the estimated Vref values. My conclusion at this point is that if we run the 3D calculation with 80 m grid spacing and Vsmin of 400 m/s (or lower), then we probably do not need to apply any site adjustments.</i> | However, since we are using a denser mesh (80m) and a lower minimum Vs (400 m/s), we will not apply site correction to the low-frequency seismograms before combining. Rob states, <i>You may recall that there is a klugy process we have used to estimate the Vref value based on the Vsmin and grid spacing of the model. But, it has only been applied for the case of h=100 m and Vsmin=500 m/s. What I found here is that estimating Vref using the 80m & 400m/s model is that Vref is almost always less than Vs30 (i.e., Vsite). This means that when the site adjustment is applied, the motions are deamplified. This is why we see such a poor fit for the 3D case when using the estimated Vref values. My conclusion at this point is that if we run the 3D calculation with 80 m grid spacing and Vsmin of 400 m/s (or lower), then we probably do not need to apply any site adjustments.</i> | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Hazard Curve Tests == | ||
+ | |||
+ | We are calculating test hazard curves for the following sites: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| | ||
+ | | [[File:Study_24.6_test_sites_map.png|thumb|600px]] | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Low-frequency curves === | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| | ||
+ | ! Site !! 2 sec !! 3 sec !! 5 sec !! 10 sec !! Vertical profile | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! s3446 | ||
+ | | [[File:s3446_10676_2sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3446_10676_3sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3446_10676_5sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3446_10676_10sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3446_vert_profile.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | [[File:s3446_10676_2sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3446_10676_3sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3446_10676_5sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3446_10676_10sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! s3240 | ||
+ | | [[File:s3240_10677_2sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3240_10677_3sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3240_10677_5sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3240_10677_10sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3240_vert_profile.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | [[File:s3240_10677_2sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3240_10677_3sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3240_10677_5sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3240_10677_10sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! ALBY | ||
+ | | [[File:ALBY_10678_2sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:ALBY_10678_3sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:ALBY_10678_5sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:ALBY_10678_10sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:ALBY_vert_profile.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | [[File:ALBY_10678_2sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:ALBY_10678_3sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:ALBY_10678_5sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:ALBY_10678_10sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! SJO | ||
+ | | [[File:SJO_10683_2sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:SJO_10683_3sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:SJO_10683_5sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:SJO_10683_10sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:SJO_vert_profile.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | [[File:SJO_10683_2sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:SJO_10683_3sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:SJO_10683_5sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:SJO_10683_10sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! CFCS | ||
+ | | [[File:CFCS_10684_2sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:CFCS_10684_3sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:CFCS_10684_5sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:CFCS_10684_10sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:CFCS_vert_profile.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | [[File:CFCS_10684_2sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:CFCS_10684_3sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:CFCS_10684_5sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:CFCS_10684_10sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! s3171 | ||
+ | | [[File:s3171_10685_2sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3171_10685_3sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3171_10685_5sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3171_10685_10sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3171_vert_profile.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | [[File:s3171_10685_2sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3171_10685_3sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3171_10685_5sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3171_10685_10sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! CSUEB | ||
+ | | [[File:CSUEB_10687_2sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:CSUEB_10687_3sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:CSUEB_10687_5sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:CSUEB_10687_10sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:CSUEB_vert_profile.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | [[File:CSUEB_10687_2sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:CSUEB_10687_3sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:CSUEB_10687_5sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:CSUEB_10687_10sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! CSU1 | ||
+ | | [[File:CSU1_10686_2sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:CSU1_10686_3sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:CSU1_10686_5sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:CSU1_10686_10sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:CSU1_vert_profile.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | [[File:CSU1_10686_2sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:CSU1_10686_3sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:CSU1_10686_5sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:CSU1_10686_10sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! SFRH | ||
+ | | [[File:SFRH_10681_2sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:SFRH_10681_3sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:SFRH_10681_5sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:SFRH_10681_10sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:SFRH_vert_profile.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | [[File:SFRH_10681_2sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:SFRH_10681_3sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:SFRH_10681_5sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:SFRH_10681_10sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! LVMR | ||
+ | | [[File:LVMR_10682_2sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:LVMR_10682_3sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:LVMR_10682_5sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:LVMR_10682_10sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:LVMR_vert_profile.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | [[File:LVMR_10682_2sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:LVMR_10682_3sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:LVMR_10682_5sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:LVMR_10682_10sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! HAYW | ||
+ | | [[File:HAYW_10679_2sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:HAYW_10679_3sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:HAYW_10679_5sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:HAYW_10679_10sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:HAYW_vert_profile.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | [[File:HAYW_10679_2sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:HAYW_10679_3sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:HAYW_10679_5sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:HAYW_10679_10sec_RotD50_log.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | === High-frequency curves === | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| | ||
+ | ! Site !! 1 sec !! 0.5 sec !! 0.2 sec !! 0.1 sec !! Vertical profile | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! s3446 | ||
+ | | [[File:s3446_10676_1sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3446_10676_0.5sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3446_10676_0.2sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3446_10676_0.1sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3446_vert_profile.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! s3240 | ||
+ | | [[File:s3240_10689_1sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3240_10689_0.5sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3240_10689_0.2sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3240_10689_0.1sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3240_vert_profile.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! ALBY | ||
+ | | [[File:ALBY_10694_1sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:ALBY_10694_0.5sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:ALBY_10694_0.2sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:ALBY_10694_0.1sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:ALBY_vert_profile.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! SJO | ||
+ | | [[File:SJO_10695_1sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:SJO_10695_0.5sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:SJO_10695_0.2sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:SJO_10695_0.1sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:SJO_vert_profile.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! CFCS | ||
+ | | [[File:CFCS_10693_1sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:CFCS_10693_0.5sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:CFCS_10693_0.2sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:CFCS_10693_0.1sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:CFCS_vert_profile.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! s3171 | ||
+ | | [[File:s3171_10688_1sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3171_10688_0.5sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3171_10688_0.2sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3171_10688_0.1sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:s3171_vert_profile.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! CSUEB | ||
+ | | [[File:CSUEB_10691_1sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:CSUEB_10691_0.5sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:CSUEB_10691_0.2sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:CSUEB_10691_0.1sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:CSUEB_vert_profile.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! CSU1 | ||
+ | | [[File:CSU1_10692_1sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:CSU1_10692_0.5sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:CSU1_10692_0.2sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:CSU1_10692_0.1sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:CSU1_vert_profile.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! SFRH | ||
+ | | [[File:SFRH_10690_1sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:SFRH_10690_0.5sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:SFRH_10690_0.2sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:SFRH_10690_0.1sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:SFRH_vert_profile.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! LVMR | ||
+ | | [[File:LVMR_10696_1sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:LVMR_10696_0.5sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:LVMR_10696_0.2sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:LVMR_10696_0.1sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:LVMR_vert_profile.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! HAYW | ||
+ | | [[File:HAYW_10697_1sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:HAYW_10697_0.5sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:HAYW_10697_0.2sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:HAYW_10697_0.1sec_RotD50.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
+ | | [[File:HAYW_vert_profile.png|thumb|250px]] | ||
+ | |} | ||
== Updates and Enhancements == | == Updates and Enhancements == | ||
Line 407: | Line 795: | ||
==== Deterministic ==== | ==== Deterministic ==== | ||
− | *Seismograms: | + | *Seismograms: 3-component seismograms, 10000 timesteps (400 sec, dt=0.04s) each. |
*PSA: We are removing geometric mean PSA calculations from this study. | *PSA: We are removing geometric mean PSA calculations from this study. | ||
*RotD: PGV, and RotD50, the RotD50 azimuth, and RotD100 at 27 periods (20, 17, 15, 13, 12, 10, 8.5, 7.5, 6.5, 6, 5.5, 5, 4.4, 4, 3.5, 3, 2.8, 2.6, 2.4, 2.2, 2, 1.7, 1.5, 1.3, 1.2, 1.1, 1) | *RotD: PGV, and RotD50, the RotD50 azimuth, and RotD100 at 27 periods (20, 17, 15, 13, 12, 10, 8.5, 7.5, 6.5, 6, 5.5, 5, 4.4, 4, 3.5, 3, 2.8, 2.6, 2.4, 2.2, 2, 1.7, 1.5, 1.3, 1.2, 1.1, 1) | ||
− | *Fourier spectra at 27 periods (20, 17, 15, 13, 12, 10, 8.5, 7.5, 6.5, 6, 5.5, 5, 4.4, 4, 3.5, 3, 2.8, 2.6, 2.4, 2.2, 2, 1.7, 1.5, 1.3, 1.2, 1.1, 1) | + | *Vertical response spectra at 27 periods (20, 17, 15, 13, 12, 10, 8.5, 7.5, 6.5, 6, 5.5, 5, 4.4, 4, 3.5, 3, 2.8, 2.6, 2.4, 2.2, 2, 1.7, 1.5, 1.3, 1.2, 1.1, 1). |
+ | *Fourier spectra for all 3 components at 27 periods (20, 17, 15, 13, 12, 10, 8.5, 7.5, 6.5, 6, 5.5, 5, 4.4, 4, 3.5, 3, 2.8, 2.6, 2.4, 2.2, 2, 1.7, 1.5, 1.3, 1.2, 1.1, 1). | ||
*Durations: for X and Y components, energy integral, Arias intensity, cumulative absolute velocity (CAV), and for both velocity and acceleration, 5-75%, 5-95%, and 20-80%. Also, period-dependent acceleration 5-75%, 5-95%, and 20-80% for 27 periods (20, 17, 15, 13, 12, 10, 8.5, 7.5, 6.5, 6, 5.5, 5, 4.4, 4, 3.5, 3, 2.8, 2.6, 2.4, 2.2, 2, 1.7, 1.5, 1.3, 1.2, 1.1, 1). | *Durations: for X and Y components, energy integral, Arias intensity, cumulative absolute velocity (CAV), and for both velocity and acceleration, 5-75%, 5-95%, and 20-80%. Also, period-dependent acceleration 5-75%, 5-95%, and 20-80% for 27 periods (20, 17, 15, 13, 12, 10, 8.5, 7.5, 6.5, 6, 5.5, 5, 4.4, 4, 3.5, 3, 2.8, 2.6, 2.4, 2.2, 2, 1.7, 1.5, 1.3, 1.2, 1.1, 1). | ||
==== Broadband ==== | ==== Broadband ==== | ||
− | *Seismograms: 2-component seismograms, 40000 timesteps (400 sec) each. | + | *Seismograms: 2-component seismograms, 40000 timesteps (400 sec, dt=0.01s) each. |
*PSA: We are removing geometric mean PSA calculations from this study. | *PSA: We are removing geometric mean PSA calculations from this study. | ||
*RotD: PGA, PGV, and RotD50, the RotD50 azimuth, and RotD100 at 68 periods (20, 17, 15, 13, 12, 10, 8.5, 7.5, 6.5, 6, 5.5, 5, 4.4, 4, 3.5, 3, 2.8, 2.6, 2.4, 2.2, 2, 1.7, 1.5, 1.3, 1.2, 1.1, 1, 0.85, 0.75, 0.65, 0.6, 0.55, 0.5, 0.45, 0.4, 0.35, 0.3, 0.28, 0.26, 0.24, 0.22, 0.2, 0.17, 0.15, 0.13, 0.12, 0.11, 0.1, 0.085, 0.075, 0.065, 0.06, 0.055, 0.05, 0.045, 0.04, 0.035, 0.032, 0.029, 0.025, 0.022, 0.02, 0.017, 0.015, 0.013, 0.012, 0.011, 0.01) | *RotD: PGA, PGV, and RotD50, the RotD50 azimuth, and RotD100 at 68 periods (20, 17, 15, 13, 12, 10, 8.5, 7.5, 6.5, 6, 5.5, 5, 4.4, 4, 3.5, 3, 2.8, 2.6, 2.4, 2.2, 2, 1.7, 1.5, 1.3, 1.2, 1.1, 1, 0.85, 0.75, 0.65, 0.6, 0.55, 0.5, 0.45, 0.4, 0.35, 0.3, 0.28, 0.26, 0.24, 0.22, 0.2, 0.17, 0.15, 0.13, 0.12, 0.11, 0.1, 0.085, 0.075, 0.065, 0.06, 0.055, 0.05, 0.045, 0.04, 0.035, 0.032, 0.029, 0.025, 0.022, 0.02, 0.017, 0.015, 0.013, 0.012, 0.011, 0.01) | ||
− | *Fourier spectra at 68 periods (20, 17, 15, 13, 12, 10, 8.5, 7.5, 6.5, 6, 5.5, 5, 4.4, 4, 3.5, 3, 2.8, 2.6, 2.4, 2.2, 2, 1.7, 1.5, 1.3, 1.2, 1.1, 1, 0.85, 0.75, 0.65, 0.6, 0.55, 0.5, 0.45, 0.4, 0.35, 0.3, 0.28, 0.26, 0.24, 0.22, 0.2, 0.17, 0.15, 0.13, 0.12, 0.11, 0.1, 0.085, 0.075, 0.065, 0.06, 0.055, 0.05, 0.045, 0.04, 0.035, 0.032, 0.029, 0.025, 0.022, 0.02, 0.017, 0.015, 0.013, 0.012, 0.011, 0.01) | + | *Vertical response spectra at 68 periods (20, 17, 15, 13, 12, 10, 8.5, 7.5, 6.5, 6, 5.5, 5, 4.4, 4, 3.5, 3, 2.8, 2.6, 2.4, 2.2, 2, 1.7, 1.5, 1.3, 1.2, 1.1, 1). |
+ | *Fourier spectra for all 3 components at 68 periods (20, 17, 15, 13, 12, 10, 8.5, 7.5, 6.5, 6, 5.5, 5, 4.4, 4, 3.5, 3, 2.8, 2.6, 2.4, 2.2, 2, 1.7, 1.5, 1.3, 1.2, 1.1, 1, 0.85, 0.75, 0.65, 0.6, 0.55, 0.5, 0.45, 0.4, 0.35, 0.3, 0.28, 0.26, 0.24, 0.22, 0.2, 0.17, 0.15, 0.13, 0.12, 0.11, 0.1, 0.085, 0.075, 0.065, 0.06, 0.055, 0.05, 0.045, 0.04, 0.035, 0.032, 0.029, 0.025, 0.022, 0.02, 0.017, 0.015, 0.013, 0.012, 0.011, 0.01) | ||
*Durations: for X and Y components, energy integral, Arias intensity, cumulative absolute velocity (CAV), and for both velocity and acceleration, 5-75%, 5-95%, and 20-80%. Also, period-dependent acceleration 5-75%, 5-95%, and 20-80% for 68 periods (20, 17, 15, 13, 12, 10, 8.5, 7.5, 6.5, 6, 5.5, 5, 4.4, 4, 3.5, 3, 2.8, 2.6, 2.4, 2.2, 2, 1.7, 1.5, 1.3, 1.2, 1.1, 1, 0.85, 0.75, 0.65, 0.6, 0.55, 0.5, 0.45, 0.4, 0.35, 0.3, 0.28, 0.26, 0.24, 0.22, 0.2, 0.17, 0.15, 0.13, 0.12, 0.11, 0.1, 0.085, 0.075, 0.065, 0.06, 0.055, 0.05, 0.045, 0.04, 0.035, 0.032, 0.029, 0.025, 0.022, 0.02, 0.017, 0.015, 0.013, 0.012, 0.011, 0.01) | *Durations: for X and Y components, energy integral, Arias intensity, cumulative absolute velocity (CAV), and for both velocity and acceleration, 5-75%, 5-95%, and 20-80%. Also, period-dependent acceleration 5-75%, 5-95%, and 20-80% for 68 periods (20, 17, 15, 13, 12, 10, 8.5, 7.5, 6.5, 6, 5.5, 5, 4.4, 4, 3.5, 3, 2.8, 2.6, 2.4, 2.2, 2, 1.7, 1.5, 1.3, 1.2, 1.1, 1, 0.85, 0.75, 0.65, 0.6, 0.55, 0.5, 0.45, 0.4, 0.35, 0.3, 0.28, 0.26, 0.24, 0.22, 0.2, 0.17, 0.15, 0.13, 0.12, 0.11, 0.1, 0.085, 0.075, 0.065, 0.06, 0.055, 0.05, 0.045, 0.04, 0.035, 0.032, 0.029, 0.025, 0.022, 0.02, 0.017, 0.015, 0.013, 0.012, 0.011, 0.01) | ||
Line 442: | Line 832: | ||
== Computational and Data Estimates == | == Computational and Data Estimates == | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Computational Estimates === | ||
+ | |||
+ | We based these estimates on the 11 test sites. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| class="wikitable" | ||
+ | |+SGT calculation | ||
+ | ! !! UCVM runtime !! UCVM nodes !! SGT runtime (3 components) !! SGT nodes !! Other SGT workflow jobs !! Frontier Total | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! Average of 11 test sites | ||
+ | | 761 sec || 96 || 7134 sec || 100 || 7200 node-sec || 220 node-hrs | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | 220 node-hrs/site x 315 sites + 10% overrun = 76,230 node-hours for SGT workflows. | ||
== Lessons Learned == | == Lessons Learned == |
Revision as of 03:29, 8 July 2024
CyberShake Study 24.1 is an upcoming study in Northern California which includes deterministic low-frequency (0-1 Hz) and stochastic high-frequency (1-50 Hz) simulations. We will use the Graves & Pitarka (2022) rupture generator and the high frequency modules from the SCEC Broadband Platform v22.4. This study includes vertical component seismograms, period-dependent durations, and Fourier spectra IMs, and a reduction in minimum Vs to 400 m/s.
Contents
- 1 Status
- 2 Data Products
- 3 Science Goals
- 4 Technical Goals
- 5 Sites
- 6 Ruptures to Include
- 7 Velocity Model
- 7.1 Primary 3D model
- 7.2 Potential modification to gabbro regions
- 7.3 Background model
- 7.4 Cross-sections
- 7.4.1 Cross-sections, no smoothing, CVM-S4.26.M01 1D background
- 7.4.2 Cross-sections, smoothing, CVM-S4.26.M01 1D background
- 7.4.3 Cross-sections, no smoothing, Southern Sierra BBP 1D background
- 7.4.4 Cross-sections, no smoothing, extended SFCVM Sierra 1D background, CCA + taper
- 7.4.5 Cross-sections, smoothing, extended SFCVM Sierra 1D background, CCA + taper
- 7.4.6 Cross-sections, no smoothing, extended SFCVM Sierra 1D background with taper, CCA + taper
- 7.5 Candidate Model (RC1)
- 7.6 Vp/Vs Ratio Adjustment
- 8 Strain Green Tensors
- 9 Vertical Component
- 10 Rupture Generator
- 11 High-frequency codes
- 12 Hazard Curve Tests
- 13 Updates and Enhancements
- 14 Output Data Products
- 15 Computational and Data Estimates
- 16 Lessons Learned
- 17 Stress Test
- 18 Events During Study
- 19 Performance Metrics
- 20 Production Checklist
- 21 Presentations, Posters, and Papers
- 22 References
Status
This study is in the planning phase. We hope to begin this study in mid-2024.
Data Products
Science Goals
The science goals for this study are:
- To perform an updated broadband study for the greater Bay Area.
- To use an updated rupture generator and improved velocity model from Study 18.8.
- To use the same parameters as in Study 22.12 when possible to make comparisons between the studies simple.
Technical Goals
The technical goals for this study are:
- Use Frontier for the SGTs and Frontera for the post-processing and high-frequency calculations.
- Use a modified approach for the production database, to improve performance.
Sites
For this study, we chose to focus on a smaller region than in Study 18.8. Starting with the Study 18.8 region, we selected a smaller (180 km x 100 km) box extending roughly from San Jose to Santa Rosa, containing 315 sites.
![]() |
Ruptures to Include
Summary: we decided to exclude the southern San Andreas events from Study 24.1. This was implemented by creating a new ERF with ID 64, which includes all the ERF 36 ruptures except for the southern San Andreas events.
Historically, we have determined which ruptures to include in a CyberShake run by calculating the distance between the site and the closest part of the rupture surface. If that distance is less than 200 km, we then include all ruptures which take place on that surface, including ruptures which may extend much farther away from the site than 200 km.
For Northern California sites, this means that sites around San Jose and south include southern San Andreas events (events which rupture the northernmost segment of the southern San Andreas) within 200 km. Since there are some UCERF2 ruptures which extend from the Parkfield segment all the way down to Bombay Beach, the simulation volumes for some of these Northern California sites cover most of the state. This was the case for Study 18.8 (sample volumes can be seen on this page). This required tiling together 3 3D models and a background 1D model.
To simplify the velocity model and reduce the volumes, we are investigating omitting southern San Andreas events from this study.
Source Contribution Curves
Below are source contribution curves for 3 sites: s3430 (southwest corner of the study region), s3446 (southeast corner of the study region), and SJO (San Jose). In general, the sSAF events are about the 3rd largest contributor at long periods and medium-to-long return periods.
Site | 2 sec | 3 sec | 5 sec | 10 sec |
---|---|---|---|---|
s3430 | ||||
s3446 | ||||
SJO |
We also looked at the source contributions for these 3 sites from ASK 2014. In general, the sSAF events play a reduced role compared to the CyberShake results.
Site | 2 sec | 3 sec | 5 sec | 10 sec |
---|---|---|---|---|
s3430 | ||||
s3446 | ||||
SJO |
Disaggregations
From Study 18.8, we looked at disaggregations for s3430, s3446, and SJO at 1e-3 (1000 yr), 4e-4 (2500 yr), and 1e-4 (10000 yr) probability levels, at 2 and 10 seconds. We list the top 3 contributing sources from the southern SAF, their magnitude ranges, and their contributing percentages.
The only significant contributions are for site s3446 at 10 second period. Those come from large events, with median magnitude 7.85 or higher.
s3430
Period | 1e-3 | 4e-4 | 1e-4 |
---|---|---|---|
2 sec | 80 (S. San Andreas;PK, M5.65-6.35), <0.01% 81 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH, M6.75-7.35), <0.01% 82 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH+CC, M7.15-7.65), <0.01% |
80 (S. San Andreas;PK, M5.65-6.35), <0.01% 81 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH, M6.75-7.35), <0.01% 82 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH+CC, M7.15-7.65), <0.01% |
80 (S. San Andreas;PK, M5.65-6.35), <0.01% 81 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH, M6.75-7.35), <0.01% 82 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH+CC, M7.15-7.65), <0.01% |
10 sec | 86 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH+CC+BB+NM+SM+NSB, M7.65-8.25), 0.01% 89 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH+CC+BB+NM+SM+NSB+SSB+BG+CO, M7.75-8.45), 0.01% 85 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH+CC+BB+NM+SM, M7.55-8.15), <0.01% |
89 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH+CC+BB+NM+SM+NSB+SSB+BG+CO, M7.75-8.45), <0.01% 80 (S. San Andreas;PK, M5.65-6.35), <0.01% 81 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH, M6.75-7.35), <0.01% |
80 (S. San Andreas;PK, M5.65-6.35), <0.01% 81 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH, M6.75-7.35), <0.01% 82 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH+CC, M7.15-7.65), <0.01% |
s3446
Period | 1e-3 | 4e-4 | 1e-4 |
---|---|---|---|
2 sec | 84 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH+CC+BB+NM, M7.45-7.95), <0.01% 89 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH+CC+BB+NM+SM+NSB+SSB+BG+CO, M7.75-8.45), <0.01% 80 (S. San Andreas;PK, M5.65-6.35), <0.01% |
80 (S. San Andreas;PK, M5.65-6.35), <0.01% 81 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH, M6.75-7.35), <0.01% 82 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH+CC, M7.15-7.65), <0.01% |
80 (S. San Andreas;PK, M5.65-6.35), <0.01% 81 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH, M6.75-7.35), <0.01% 82 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH+CC, M7.15-7.65), <0.01% |
10 sec | 85 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH+CC+BB+NM+SM, M7.55-8.15), 6.83% 86 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH+CC+BB+NM+SM+NSB, M7.65-8.25), 4.18% 84 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH+CC+BB+NM, M7.45-7.95), 1.53% |
85 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH+CC+BB+NM+SM, M7.55-8.15), 4.27% 86 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH+CC+BB+NM+SM+NSB, M7.65-8.25), 3.09% 89 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH+CC+BB+NM+SM+NSB+SSB+BG+CO, M7.75-8.45), 1.08% |
86 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH+CC+BB+NM+SM+NSB, M7.65-8.25), 1.19% 85 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH+CC+BB+NM+SM, M7.55-8.15), 1.19% 89 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH+CC+BB+NM+SM+NSB+SSB+BG+CO, M7.75-8.45), 0.55% |
SJO
Period | 1e-3 | 4e-4 | 1e-4 |
---|---|---|---|
2 sec | 80 (S. San Andreas;PK, M5.65-6.35), <0.01% 81 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH, M6.75-7.35), <0.01% 82 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH+CC, M7.15-7.65), <0.01% |
80 (S. San Andreas;PK, M5.65-6.35), <0.01% 81 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH, M6.75-7.35), <0.01% 82 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH+CC, M7.15-7.65), <0.01% |
80 (S. San Andreas;PK, M5.65-6.35), <0.01% 81 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH, M6.75-7.35), <0.01% 82 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH+CC, M7.15-7.65), <0.01% |
10 sec | 85 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH+CC+BB+NM+SM, M7.55-8.15), 0.09% 86 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH+CC+BB+NM+SM+NSB, M7.65-8.25), 0.07% 89 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH+CC+BB+NM+SM+NSB+SSB+BG+CO, M7.75-8.45), 0.05% |
89 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH+CC+BB+NM+SM+NSB+SSB+BG+CO, M7.75-8.45), 0.01% 88 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH+CC+BB+NM+SM+NSB+SSB+BG, M7.75-8.35), 0.01% 86 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH+CC+BB+NM+SM+NSB, M7.65-8.25), <0.01% |
80 (S. San Andreas;PK, M5.65-6.35), <0.01% 81 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH, M6.75-7.35), <0.01% 82 (S. San Andreas;PK+CH+CC, M7.15-7.65), <0.01% |
Velocity Model
We will perform validation of the proposed velocity model using northern California BBP events.
To line up closely with the USGS SF model angle, we will generate volumes using an angle of -36 degrees.
For generating sample meshes, we will use site s3446, a site in the SE corner of the study region with one of the larger volumes.
Primary 3D model
Given the extensive low-velocity near-surface regions in the USGS SF CVM, we plan to use a minimum Vs of 400 m/s (and therefore a grid spacing of 80 m).
Initial slices with the USGS SF CVM are available here: UCVM_sfcvm_geomodelgrid. We found two sharply defined high-velocity patches visible on the surface slice, one in the East Bay near the mountains, and another near Gilroy. These are regions where the gabbro type goes to the surface, and so the SF CVM geological rules dictate that the high velocities go to the surface as well.
These patches are not present in the Vs30 models - for instance, for the point (37.6827, -122.086) SF CVM gives a surface Vs of about 3500 m/s, but Wills (2015) has Vs30=710 and Thompson (2018) has Vs30=702.
Potential modification to gabbro regions
A candidate modification to the gabbro regions to reduce the near-surface velocities is to apply the approach used by Arben Pitarka and Rie Nakata, detailed below.
Component | At surface | At 7.75 km depth | derivation |
---|---|---|---|
Vp | 4.2 km/s | 5.7 km/s | Linear interpolation |
Vs | 2.44 km/s | 3.4 km/s | Vp/Vs relationship |
Density | 2.76 g/cm3 | 2.87 g/cm3 | Vp/Density relationship |
The Vs (km/s) values are derived from Vp (km/s) using the San Leandro Gabbro relationship:
Vs = 0.7858 - 1.2344*Vp + 0.7949*Vp^2 - 0.1238*Vp^3 + 0.0064*Vp^4
The density (g/cm3) values are derived from Vp (km/s) using the San Leandro Gabbro relationship:
density = 2.4372 + 0.0761*Vp
A sample plot is below.
Background model
There are several candidates to use as a background model for the regions outside of the 3D model region.
1D models
- 1D Broadband Platform model - either Northern California, Central California, or the Southern Sierras.
- 1D CVM-S4 background model
- Extend eastern edge of SFCVM model to fill the remaining volume
- 1D CCA model (derived from averaging CCA-06), used in Study 17.3
3D models
- 3D CANVAS long-period tomography model
- 3D National Crustal model
Plots of these options are available below.
1D Model | BBP NorCal | BBP CenCal | BBP SouthernSierras | CVM-S4.26.M01 1D background | CCA 1D |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Plot |
Cross-sections
Cross-sections, no smoothing, CVM-S4.26.M01 1D background
Below are horizontal cross-sections at various depths taken from a model for s3446 generated without smoothing, with the tiling SFCVM, CCA-06, CVM-S4.26.M01. This model was extracted on 2/28/24, and is one of the largest volumes needed for the study.
0m | 80m | 800m | 2000m | 4000m | 10000m |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Below are vertical cross-sections taken from a model for s3446 generated without smoothing, with the tiling SFCVM, CCA-06, CVM-S4.26.M01. This model was extracted on 2/28/24, and is one of the largest volumes needed for the study.
Y=2400 | Y=4800 | Y=7200 |
---|---|---|
X=1400 | X=2800 |
---|---|
Cross-sections, smoothing, CVM-S4.26.M01 1D background
Below are horizontal cross-sections at various depths taken from a model for s3446 generated with smoothing, with the tiling SFCVM, CCA-06, CVM-S4.26.M01. This model was extracted on 2/28/24.
0m | 80m | 800m | 2000m | 4000m | 10000m |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Below are vertical cross-sections taken from a model for s3446 generated with smoothing, with the tiling SFCVM, CCA-06, CVM-S4.26.M01. This model was extracted on 2/28/24.
Y=2400 | Y=4800 | Y=7200 |
---|---|---|
X=1400 | X=2800 |
---|---|
Cross-sections, no smoothing, Southern Sierra BBP 1D background
Below are horizontal cross-sections at various depths taken from a model for s3446 generated without smoothing, with the tiling SFCVM, CCA-06, Southern Sierra BBP1D model. This model was extracted on 3/13/24.
0m | 80m | 800m | 2000m | 4000m | 10000m |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Below are horizontal cross-sections at various depths taken from a model for s3446 generated without smoothing, with the tiling SFCVM, CCA-06, Southern Sierra BBP1D model. This model was extracted on 3/13/24.
Y=2400 | Y=4800 | Y=7200 |
---|---|---|
X=1400 | X=2800 |
---|---|
Cross-sections, no smoothing, extended SFCVM Sierra 1D background, CCA + taper
Below are horizontal cross-sections at various depths taken from a model for s3446 generated without smoothing, with the tiling SFCVM, CCA-06 + taper, 1D representation of the Sierra foothills in SFCVM. This model was extracted on 4/2/24.
0m | 80m | 800m | 2000m | 4000m | 10000m |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Below are vertical cross-sections.
Y=2400 | Y=4800 | Y=7200 |
---|---|---|
X=1400 | X=2800 |
---|---|
Cross-sections, smoothing, extended SFCVM Sierra 1D background, CCA + taper
Below are horizontal cross-sections at various depths taken from a model for s3446 generated with smoothing, with the tiling SFCVM, CCA-06 + taper, 1D representation of the Sierra foothills in SFCVM. This model was extracted on 4/2/24.
0m | 80m | 800m | 2000m | 4000m | 10000m |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Below are vertical cross-sections.
Y=2400 | Y=4800 | Y=7200 |
---|---|---|
X=1400 | X=2800 |
---|---|
Cross-sections, no smoothing, extended SFCVM Sierra 1D background with taper, CCA + taper
Below are horizontal cross-sections at various depths taken from a model for s3446 generated without smoothing, with the tiling SFCVM, CCA-06 + taper, 1D representation of the Sierra foothills in SFCVM + taper. This plot includes our typical practice of populating the surface point by querying the models at a depth of grid_spacing/4, or 20m. This model was extracted on 4/9/24.
Surface (20m) | 80m | 800m | 2000m | 4000m | 10000m |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Y=2400 | Y=4800 | Y=7200 |
---|---|---|
X=1400 | X=2800 |
---|---|
Candidate Model (RC1)
Our candidate model is generated using (1) SFCVM with the gabbro modifications; (2) CCA-06 with the merged taper in the top 700m; (3) the NC1D model with the merged taper in the top 700m.
Surface (20m) | 80m | 800m | 2000m | 4000m | 10000m |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vp/Vs Ratio Adjustment
Our previous approach for applying the Vs floor is as follows:
- If Vs < Vs_floor (400 m/s):
- Calculate the Vp/Vs ratio
- Change Vs to the floor
- Calculate a new Vp using Vp = Vs_floor * Vp/Vs ratio
- Apply Vp and density floors
However, there are some sites with very high Vp/Vs ratios near the surface where Vs is low. Therefore, if this algorithm is applied, unexpectedly high Vp values may result.
Here is a vertical profile at site s3240 (Moffett Field). You can see the high surface Vp value:
Looking in more detail, here are the Vp and Vs values in the top 90m at s3240:
Depth (m) | Vp | Vs | Vp/Vs ratio | Adjusted Vs | Adjusted Vp |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 739 | 81 | 9.12 | 400 | 3649 |
10 | 1009 | 82 | 12.30 | 400 | 4922 |
20 | 1309 | 84 | 15.58 | 400 | 6233 |
30 | 1502 | 152 | 9.88 | 400 | 3953 |
40 | 1590 | 285 | 5.58 | 400 | 3649 |
50 | 1678 | 418 | 4.01 | ||
60 | 1711 | 436 | 3.92 | ||
70 | 1744 | 453 | 3.85 | ||
80 | 1776 | 471 | 3.77 | ||
90 | 1807 | 489 | 3.70 |
Since we are using 80m grid spacing, and populating the surface point at a depth of (grid spacing)/4 = 20m, the values at 20m and 80m are being used. The very high Vp/Vs ratio at 20m means that a very high Vp value is used.
These high Vp/Vs ratios occur at a number of locations around San Francisco Bay, illustrated in the surface Vp plot below:
To solve this problem, we will modify the process for applying the Vs floor. We will use the Vp/Vs ratio at 80m depth instead of at the surface, and use a maximum ratio of 4. A similar process was used in the HighF project.
- If Vs < Vs_floor (400 m/s):
- If surface grid point:
- Calculate Vp/Vs ratio at 1 grid point depth (80m)
- If Vp/Vs ratio > 4:
- Lower Vp/Vs ratio to 4
- Else:
- Calculate Vp/Vs ratio at this grid point
- New Vs = Vs_floor
- New Vp = Vs * (potentially modified) Vp/Vs ratio.
- If surface grid point:
- Apply Vp and density floors.
Strain Green Tensors
We will use the HIP implementation of AWP-ODC-SGT, with the following parameters:
- Grid spacing: 80 m
- DT: 0.004 sec
- NT: 50000 timesteps by default, increased to 75000 for sites with any site-to-hypocenter distance greater than 450 km.
- Minimum Vs: 400 m/s
SGTs will be saved with a time decimation of 10, so every 0.04 sec.
Vertical Component
We will include vertical (Z) component seismograms in this study. To support this, we will produce Z-component SGTs and include Z-component synthesis in the post-processing and broadband stages.
Verification that the Z component codes are working correctly is documented at Vertical component verification.
Rupture Generator
We will use the same version of the rupture generator that we used for Study 22.12, v5.5.2.
To match the SGT timestep, SRFs will be generated with dt=0.04s, deterministic seismograms will be output with dt=0.04s, and broadband seismograms will use dt=0.01s.
High-frequency codes
We will use the Graves & Pitarka high-frequency codes from the BBP v22.4.
However, since we are using a denser mesh (80m) and a lower minimum Vs (400 m/s), we will not apply site correction to the low-frequency seismograms before combining. Rob states, You may recall that there is a klugy process we have used to estimate the Vref value based on the Vsmin and grid spacing of the model. But, it has only been applied for the case of h=100 m and Vsmin=500 m/s. What I found here is that estimating Vref using the 80m & 400m/s model is that Vref is almost always less than Vs30 (i.e., Vsite). This means that when the site adjustment is applied, the motions are deamplified. This is why we see such a poor fit for the 3D case when using the estimated Vref values. My conclusion at this point is that if we run the 3D calculation with 80 m grid spacing and Vsmin of 400 m/s (or lower), then we probably do not need to apply any site adjustments.
Hazard Curve Tests
We are calculating test hazard curves for the following sites:
Low-frequency curves
Site | 2 sec | 3 sec | 5 sec | 10 sec | Vertical profile |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
s3446 | |||||
s3240 | |||||
ALBY | |||||
SJO | |||||
CFCS | |||||
s3171 | |||||
CSUEB | |||||
CSU1 | |||||
SFRH | |||||
LVMR | |||||
HAYW | |||||
High-frequency curves
Site | 1 sec | 0.5 sec | 0.2 sec | 0.1 sec | Vertical profile |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
s3446 | |||||
s3240 | |||||
ALBY | |||||
SJO | |||||
CFCS | |||||
s3171 | |||||
CSUEB | |||||
CSU1 | |||||
SFRH | |||||
LVMR | |||||
HAYW |
Updates and Enhancements
- Used smaller study region than in Study 18.8.
- Removed southern San Andreas events, and created a new ERF.
Output Data Products
File-based data products
We plan to produce the following data products, which will be stored at CARC:
Deterministic
- Seismograms: 3-component seismograms, 10000 timesteps (400 sec, dt=0.04s) each.
- PSA: We are removing geometric mean PSA calculations from this study.
- RotD: PGV, and RotD50, the RotD50 azimuth, and RotD100 at 27 periods (20, 17, 15, 13, 12, 10, 8.5, 7.5, 6.5, 6, 5.5, 5, 4.4, 4, 3.5, 3, 2.8, 2.6, 2.4, 2.2, 2, 1.7, 1.5, 1.3, 1.2, 1.1, 1)
- Vertical response spectra at 27 periods (20, 17, 15, 13, 12, 10, 8.5, 7.5, 6.5, 6, 5.5, 5, 4.4, 4, 3.5, 3, 2.8, 2.6, 2.4, 2.2, 2, 1.7, 1.5, 1.3, 1.2, 1.1, 1).
- Fourier spectra for all 3 components at 27 periods (20, 17, 15, 13, 12, 10, 8.5, 7.5, 6.5, 6, 5.5, 5, 4.4, 4, 3.5, 3, 2.8, 2.6, 2.4, 2.2, 2, 1.7, 1.5, 1.3, 1.2, 1.1, 1).
- Durations: for X and Y components, energy integral, Arias intensity, cumulative absolute velocity (CAV), and for both velocity and acceleration, 5-75%, 5-95%, and 20-80%. Also, period-dependent acceleration 5-75%, 5-95%, and 20-80% for 27 periods (20, 17, 15, 13, 12, 10, 8.5, 7.5, 6.5, 6, 5.5, 5, 4.4, 4, 3.5, 3, 2.8, 2.6, 2.4, 2.2, 2, 1.7, 1.5, 1.3, 1.2, 1.1, 1).
Broadband
- Seismograms: 2-component seismograms, 40000 timesteps (400 sec, dt=0.01s) each.
- PSA: We are removing geometric mean PSA calculations from this study.
- RotD: PGA, PGV, and RotD50, the RotD50 azimuth, and RotD100 at 68 periods (20, 17, 15, 13, 12, 10, 8.5, 7.5, 6.5, 6, 5.5, 5, 4.4, 4, 3.5, 3, 2.8, 2.6, 2.4, 2.2, 2, 1.7, 1.5, 1.3, 1.2, 1.1, 1, 0.85, 0.75, 0.65, 0.6, 0.55, 0.5, 0.45, 0.4, 0.35, 0.3, 0.28, 0.26, 0.24, 0.22, 0.2, 0.17, 0.15, 0.13, 0.12, 0.11, 0.1, 0.085, 0.075, 0.065, 0.06, 0.055, 0.05, 0.045, 0.04, 0.035, 0.032, 0.029, 0.025, 0.022, 0.02, 0.017, 0.015, 0.013, 0.012, 0.011, 0.01)
- Vertical response spectra at 68 periods (20, 17, 15, 13, 12, 10, 8.5, 7.5, 6.5, 6, 5.5, 5, 4.4, 4, 3.5, 3, 2.8, 2.6, 2.4, 2.2, 2, 1.7, 1.5, 1.3, 1.2, 1.1, 1).
- Fourier spectra for all 3 components at 68 periods (20, 17, 15, 13, 12, 10, 8.5, 7.5, 6.5, 6, 5.5, 5, 4.4, 4, 3.5, 3, 2.8, 2.6, 2.4, 2.2, 2, 1.7, 1.5, 1.3, 1.2, 1.1, 1, 0.85, 0.75, 0.65, 0.6, 0.55, 0.5, 0.45, 0.4, 0.35, 0.3, 0.28, 0.26, 0.24, 0.22, 0.2, 0.17, 0.15, 0.13, 0.12, 0.11, 0.1, 0.085, 0.075, 0.065, 0.06, 0.055, 0.05, 0.045, 0.04, 0.035, 0.032, 0.029, 0.025, 0.022, 0.02, 0.017, 0.015, 0.013, 0.012, 0.011, 0.01)
- Durations: for X and Y components, energy integral, Arias intensity, cumulative absolute velocity (CAV), and for both velocity and acceleration, 5-75%, 5-95%, and 20-80%. Also, period-dependent acceleration 5-75%, 5-95%, and 20-80% for 68 periods (20, 17, 15, 13, 12, 10, 8.5, 7.5, 6.5, 6, 5.5, 5, 4.4, 4, 3.5, 3, 2.8, 2.6, 2.4, 2.2, 2, 1.7, 1.5, 1.3, 1.2, 1.1, 1, 0.85, 0.75, 0.65, 0.6, 0.55, 0.5, 0.45, 0.4, 0.35, 0.3, 0.28, 0.26, 0.24, 0.22, 0.2, 0.17, 0.15, 0.13, 0.12, 0.11, 0.1, 0.085, 0.075, 0.065, 0.06, 0.055, 0.05, 0.045, 0.04, 0.035, 0.032, 0.029, 0.025, 0.022, 0.02, 0.017, 0.015, 0.013, 0.012, 0.011, 0.01)
Database data products
We plan to store the following data products in the database on moment-carc:
Deterministic
- RotD50 for 6 periods (10, 7.5, 5, 4, 3, 2). Note that we are NOT storing RotD100.
- Duration: acceleration 5-75% and 5-95%, for both X and Y, and acceleration 5-75% and 5-95% for 6 periods (10, 7.5, 5, 4, 3, 2).
Broadband
- RotD50 for PGA, PGV, and 19 periods (10, 7.5, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0.75, 0.5, 0.4, 0.3, 0.2, 0.1, 0.075, 0.05, 0.04, 0.03, 0.02, 0.01). Note that we are NOT storing RotD100.
- Duration: acceleration 5-75% and 5-95%, for both X and Y, and acceleration 5-75% and 5-95% for 19 periods (10, 7.5, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0.75, 0.5, 0.4, 0.3, 0.2, 0.1, 0.075, 0.05, 0.04, 0.03, 0.02, 0.01).
Hazard products
For each site, we will produce hazard curves from the deterministic results at 10, 5, 3, and 2 seconds, and from the broadband results at 10, 5, 3, 2, 1, 0.5, 0.2, and 0.1 seconds.
When the study is complete, we will produce maps from the deterministic results at 10, 5, 3, and 2 seconds, and from the broadband results at 10, 5, 3, 2, 1, 0.5, 0.2, and 0.1 seconds.
Computational and Data Estimates
Computational Estimates
We based these estimates on the 11 test sites.
UCVM runtime | UCVM nodes | SGT runtime (3 components) | SGT nodes | Other SGT workflow jobs | Frontier Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average of 11 test sites | 761 sec | 96 | 7134 sec | 100 | 7200 node-sec | 220 node-hrs |
220 node-hrs/site x 315 sites + 10% overrun = 76,230 node-hours for SGT workflows.