Difference between revisions of "Staff Priorities - Scott"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Yesterday == | == Yesterday == | ||
− | *Monitored production runs - poor performance, emailed ISI about changing lustre stripe size | + | *Monitored production runs - poor performance, emailed ISI about changing lustre stripe size, added O_NOATIME flag |
*No improvement with 960 cores, back to 480, down to 2 simultaneous workflows | *No improvement with 960 cores, back to 480, down to 2 simultaneous workflows | ||
*Sent out disaggregation results and new plots for Kim | *Sent out disaggregation results and new plots for Kim |
Revision as of 17:18, 12 October 2012
Yesterday
- Monitored production runs - poor performance, emailed ISI about changing lustre stripe size, added O_NOATIME flag
- No improvement with 960 cores, back to 480, down to 2 simultaneous workflows
- Sent out disaggregation results and new plots for Kim
Today
- Add description of seismogram and PSA header design decisions
- Test PSA insertions
- Monitor runs with changed parameters
Blocked
- No
Follow-ups
- No
- Run test of I/O forwarding on Kraken
- Continue testing compiler optimizations
- Run some I/O tests to get reference values
Areas of Responsibilities
- CyberShake 1.4
- Broadband CyberShake
- Code migration