Difference between revisions of "CyberShake 1D Model"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
=== CVM-H 11.9.1 with GTL === | === CVM-H 11.9.1 with GTL === | ||
| − | [ | + | [http://hypocenter.usc.edu/research/plots/1dcybershake/plot_CVM-H%2011.9.1%20with%20GTL_Vp_avg.pdf" Vp average plot] <br /> |
| − | [ | + | [http://hypocenter.usc.edu/research/plots/1dcybershake/plot_CVM-H%2011.9.1%20with%20GTL_Vs_avg.pdf" Vs average plot] <br /> |
| − | [ | + | [http://hypocenter.usc.edu/research/plots/1dcybershake/plot_CVM-H%2011.9.1%20with%20GTL_Rho_avg.pdf" Rho average plot] |
Revision as of 22:21, 23 January 2014
1D Model Selection for CyberShake
Currently, there are multiple alternative 1D models being evaluated for the next CyberShake run.
Below are plots averaging each CVM (CVM-S4, CVM-S4.26, and CVM-H 11.9.1 with GTL) over the 286 stations included within the last CyberShake 13.4 study.
CVM-S
Vp average plot
Vs average plot
Rho average plot
CVM-S4.26
Vp average plot
Vs average plot
Rho average plot
