Difference between revisions of "CyberShake 1D Model"

From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 19: Line 19:
 
=== CVM-H 11.9.1 with GTL ===
 
=== CVM-H 11.9.1 with GTL ===
  
[http://hypocenter.usc.edu/research/plots/1dcybershake/plot_CVM-H%2011.9.1%20with%20GTL_Vp_avg.pdf" Vp average plot] <br />
+
[http://hypocenter.usc.edu/research/plots/1dcybershake/plot_CVM-H%2011.9.1%20with%20GTL_Vp_avg.pdf Vp average plot] <br />
[http://hypocenter.usc.edu/research/plots/1dcybershake/plot_CVM-H%2011.9.1%20with%20GTL_Vs_avg.pdf" Vs average plot] <br />
+
[http://hypocenter.usc.edu/research/plots/1dcybershake/plot_CVM-H%2011.9.1%20with%20GTL_Vs_avg.pdf Vs average plot] <br />
[http://hypocenter.usc.edu/research/plots/1dcybershake/plot_CVM-H%2011.9.1%20with%20GTL_Rho_avg.pdf" Rho average plot]
+
[http://hypocenter.usc.edu/research/plots/1dcybershake/plot_CVM-H%2011.9.1%20with%20GTL_Rho_avg.pdf Rho average plot]

Revision as of 22:21, 23 January 2014

1D Model Selection for CyberShake

Currently, there are multiple alternative 1D models being evaluated for the next CyberShake run.

Below are plots averaging each CVM (CVM-S4, CVM-S4.26, and CVM-H 11.9.1 with GTL) over the 286 stations included within the last CyberShake 13.4 study.

CVM-S

Vp average plot
Vs average plot
Rho average plot

CVM-S4.26

Vp average plot
Vs average plot
Rho average plot

CVM-H 11.9.1 with GTL

Vp average plot
Vs average plot
Rho average plot