Difference between revisions of "CyberShake 1D Model"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
[http://hypocenter.usc.edu/research/plots/1dcybershake/1Dcomp_Vs.pdf Vs plot] <br /> | [http://hypocenter.usc.edu/research/plots/1dcybershake/1Dcomp_Vs.pdf Vs plot] <br /> | ||
[http://hypocenter.usc.edu/research/plots/1dcybershake/1Dcomp_Rho.pdf Rho plot] | [http://hypocenter.usc.edu/research/plots/1dcybershake/1Dcomp_Rho.pdf Rho plot] | ||
| + | |||
| + | === SCEC 1D === | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[File:http://scec.usc.edu/scecpedia/File:Plot_SCEC1D.png]] | ||
Revision as of 20:35, 27 January 2014
Contents
1D Model Selection for CyberShake
Currently, there are multiple alternative 1D models being evaluated for the next CyberShake run.
Below are plots averaging each CVM (CVM-S4, CVM-S4.26, and CVM-H 11.9.1 with GTL) over the 286 stations included within the last CyberShake 13.4 study.
CVM-S
Vp average plot
Vs average plot
Rho average plot
CVM-S4.26
Vp average plot
Vs average plot
Rho average plot
CVM-H 11.9.1 with GTL
Vp average plot
Vs average plot
Rho average plot
