|
|
| (179 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | == Yesterday ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | - Met with TH briefly on aftershock prototype<br />
| |
| − | - Gave some minor changes<br />
| |
| − | - Implemented fixes and enhancements, e.g. search criteria<br />
| |
| − | - Emailed with PM about deployment strategy on local computer<br />
| |
| − | - Seems to be ultimately be working but not without hiccups<br />
| |
| − | - Implemented node access permissions correctly<br />
| |
| − | - Tried a couple of different approaches, neither worked<br />
| |
| − | - Finally found FlexiAccess module which works perfectly<br />
| |
| − | - Uses ACLs to determine node access permissions<br />
| |
| − | - Node access permissions also wound up fixing dashboard<br />
| |
| − | - Relayed ShakeOut task to DS, JM<br />
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Today ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | - Web meeting @ 11am<br />
| |
| − | - Test web deployment instructions against Yosemite VM<br />
| |
| − | - Would like to have a clean set of instructions for new dev instance<br />
| |
| − | - Work on feedback from web call and known issues<br />
| |
| − | - Promote to aftershock after web call feedback and changes<br />
| |
| − | - Add in other pub types (book chapters, reports, etc.)<br />
| |
| − | - KVM performance issues<br />
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Blocked ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | - No
| |
| − |
| |
| | == Followups == | | == Followups == |
| | | | |
| − | - Web call
| + | * No |
