Difference between revisions of "Rupture Variation Generator v5.2.3 Verification"
| (11 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
|} | |} | ||
| − | == | + | == CyberShake vs CyberShake Scatter Plots == |
| + | |||
| + | Below are CyberShake vs CyberShake scatter plots for v3.3.1 (x axis, G&P 2014) and v5.2.3 (y axis, G&P 2015) runs, for SBSM and USC at 3, 5, and 10 sec. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {| border="1" | ||
| + | ! Site/Rupture Generator | ||
| + | ! 3s, 6<M<7, dist<70km | ||
| + | ! 5s, 6<M<7, dist<70km | ||
| + | ! 10s, 6<M<7, dist<70km | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | ! SBSM | ||
| + | | [[File:SBSM_mag6to7_dist0to70_3s_run4683_vs_4686.png|thumb|350px]] | ||
| + | | [[File:SBSM_mag6to7_dist0to70_5s_run4683_vs_4686.png|thumb|350px]] | ||
| + | | [[File:SBSM_mag6to7_dist0to70_10s_run4683_vs_4686.png|thumb|350px]] | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | ! USC | ||
| + | | [[File:USC_mag6to7_dist0to70_3s_run4681_vs_4685.png|thumb|350px]] | ||
| + | | [[File:USC_mag6to7_dist0to70_5s_run4681_vs_4685.png|thumb|350px]] | ||
| + | | [[File:USC_mag6to7_dist0to70_10s_run4681_vs_4685.png|thumb|350px]] | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Comparison of small events for USC == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Below is a comparison of source 145, rupture 2 (M6.15) for USC, with G&P 2014 and 2015. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Seismogram plot: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {| | ||
| + | | [[File:Seismogram_USC_s145_r2_rv7_4681v4685.png|thumb|800px]] | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | PSA plot: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {| | ||
| + | | [[File:PeakVals_USC_s145_r2_rv7_4681v4685.png|thumb|800px]] | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | The two SRFs are available [http://hypocenter.usc.edu/research/cybershake/GP2015_Verification/v3.3.1_145_2_7_uniform.srf here (G&P 2014, v3.3.1)] and [http://hypocenter.usc.edu/research/cybershake/GP2015_Verification/v5.2.3_145_2_7_uniform.srf here (G&P 2015, v5.2.3)]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Below is a comparison of source 143, rupture 2 (M6.15) for USC, with G&P 2014 and 2015. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Seismogram plot: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {| | ||
| + | | [[File:Seismogram_USC_s143_r2_rv7_4681v4685.png|thumb|800px]] | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | PSA plot: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {| | ||
| + | | [[File:PeakVals_USC_s143_r2_rv7_4681v4685.png|thumb|800px]] | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | The two SRFs are available [http://hypocenter.usc.edu/research/cybershake/GP2015_Verification/v3.3.1_143_2_7_uniform.srf here (G&P 2014, v3.3.1)] and [http://hypocenter.usc.edu/research/cybershake/GP2015_Verification/v5.2.3_143_2_7_uniform.srf here (G&P 2015, v5.2.3)]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Comparison of source 115, rupture 6 == | ||
To dig in deeper, I selected a single event (source 115, rupture 6, rupture variation 138). | To dig in deeper, I selected a single event (source 115, rupture 6, rupture variation 138). | ||
| − | Below are v3.3.1 and v5.2.3 plots for this event. | + | Below are v3.3.1 and v5.2.3 plots for this event. Note that even though both events have shypo=27.0, dhypo=12.5, the v3.3.1 hypocenter is at (-116.37060, 33.33710, 2.78240) while the v5.2.3 hypocenter is at (-116.43904, 33.39450, 9.38238). |
| + | |||
| + | {| | ||
| + | | [[File:v3.3.1_115_6_138_uniform.png|thumb|800px|left|Plot of v3.3.1 realization]] | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | [[File:v5.2.3_115_6_138_uniform.png|thumb|800px|left|Plot of v5.2.3 realization]] | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | A plot comparing the generated seismograms for both versions: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {| | ||
| + | | [[File:Seismogram_115_6_138_4683v4686.png|thumb|800px|left|Plot comparing seismograms for src=115, rup=6, rup var=138, for v3.3.1 and v5.2.3.]] | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| − | + | We repeated this for the two rupture variations which most closely match hypocenters, v3.3.1 rupture variation 172 and v5.2.3 rupture variation 117 (hypocenters ~0.2 km apart): | |
| − | [[File: | + | {| |
| + | | [[File:Seismogram_115_6_138_4683r172v4686r117.png|thumb|800px|left|Plot comparing seismograms for src=115, rup=6, with rupture variation 172 for v3.3.1 and rupture variation 117 for v5.2.3.]] | ||
| + | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 22:12, 21 October 2016
This page details the verification work with the Graves & Pitarka (2015) rupture variation generator, v5.2.3, as compared to the Graves & Pitarka (2014) rupture variation generator, v3.3.1.
Contents
Hazard Curves
Below are hazard curves for a 0.5 Hz CyberShake run, comparing v3.3.1 (black) and v5.2.3 (blue) at 3, 5, and 10 sec, for SBSM and USC.
| Site | 3 sec | 5 sec | 10 sec |
|---|---|---|---|
| SBSM | |||
| USC |
GMPE Scatter Plots
Below are GMPE scatter plots for v3.3.1 (G&P 2014) and v5.2.3 (G&P 2015) runs, for SBSM and USC at 3, 5, and 10 sec.
| Site/Rupture Generator | 3s, 6<M<7, dist<70km | 5s, 6<M<7, dist<70km | 10s, 6<M<7, dist<70km |
|---|---|---|---|
| SBSM, G&P 2014 | |||
| SBSM, G&P 2015 | |||
| USC, G&P 2014 | |||
| USC, G&P 2015 |
CyberShake vs CyberShake Scatter Plots
Below are CyberShake vs CyberShake scatter plots for v3.3.1 (x axis, G&P 2014) and v5.2.3 (y axis, G&P 2015) runs, for SBSM and USC at 3, 5, and 10 sec.
| Site/Rupture Generator | 3s, 6<M<7, dist<70km | 5s, 6<M<7, dist<70km | 10s, 6<M<7, dist<70km |
|---|---|---|---|
| SBSM | |||
| USC |
Comparison of small events for USC
Below is a comparison of source 145, rupture 2 (M6.15) for USC, with G&P 2014 and 2015.
Seismogram plot:
PSA plot:
The two SRFs are available here (G&P 2014, v3.3.1) and here (G&P 2015, v5.2.3).
Below is a comparison of source 143, rupture 2 (M6.15) for USC, with G&P 2014 and 2015.
Seismogram plot:
PSA plot:
The two SRFs are available here (G&P 2014, v3.3.1) and here (G&P 2015, v5.2.3).
Comparison of source 115, rupture 6
To dig in deeper, I selected a single event (source 115, rupture 6, rupture variation 138).
Below are v3.3.1 and v5.2.3 plots for this event. Note that even though both events have shypo=27.0, dhypo=12.5, the v3.3.1 hypocenter is at (-116.37060, 33.33710, 2.78240) while the v5.2.3 hypocenter is at (-116.43904, 33.39450, 9.38238).
A plot comparing the generated seismograms for both versions:
We repeated this for the two rupture variations which most closely match hypocenters, v3.3.1 rupture variation 172 and v5.2.3 rupture variation 117 (hypocenters ~0.2 km apart):
