Difference between revisions of "CSEP Minutes 06-06-2018"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[CSEP_Working_Group|CSEP Working Group Home Page]]<br><br> | [[CSEP_Working_Group|CSEP Working Group Home Page]]<br><br> | ||
| − | Participants: D. Jackson; J. Gilchrist; J. Vidale; D. Rhoades and W. Savran | + | Participants: D. Jackson; J. Gilchrist; J. Vidale; D. Rhoades; A. Michael and W. Savran |
== Minutes == | == Minutes == | ||
'''Leadership Retreat''' <br> | '''Leadership Retreat''' <br> | ||
| − | * Ned presentation on the future of CSEP, | + | * Ned presentation on the future of CSEP, same information that has been presented before. |
* Moving workshop around the time of SCEC annual meeting | * Moving workshop around the time of SCEC annual meeting | ||
'''CSEP1 Data set''' <br> | '''CSEP1 Data set''' <br> | ||
| − | * | + | * should focus on models that are most interesting. what constitutes an interesting model? |
| − | * | + | ** send e-mail to modelers about the scientific questions that are hoped to be learned, and what could be publishable about improving our understanding of the earthquake process |
| − | * | + | ** valuation of models elaborate vs. simple models |
| − | * | + | ** spatial etas computational efficiency and stable parameterization from usgs perspective |
| − | ** if | + | ** if models were simpler, they would be more straight forward to the reader |
| − | * | + | * important to prioritize valuable results due to limited developer/human resources |
| − | * | + | * list of references/abstract describing the models in CSEP1. send email to models that have models installed in CSEP. |
| + | * M. Werner and D. Schorlemmer expert on different models | ||
Latest revision as of 22:43, 6 June 2018
Participants: D. Jackson; J. Gilchrist; J. Vidale; D. Rhoades; A. Michael and W. Savran
Minutes
Leadership Retreat
- Ned presentation on the future of CSEP, same information that has been presented before.
- Moving workshop around the time of SCEC annual meeting
CSEP1 Data set
- should focus on models that are most interesting. what constitutes an interesting model?
- send e-mail to modelers about the scientific questions that are hoped to be learned, and what could be publishable about improving our understanding of the earthquake process
- valuation of models elaborate vs. simple models
- spatial etas computational efficiency and stable parameterization from usgs perspective
- if models were simpler, they would be more straight forward to the reader
- important to prioritize valuable results due to limited developer/human resources
- list of references/abstract describing the models in CSEP1. send email to models that have models installed in CSEP.
- M. Werner and D. Schorlemmer expert on different models
