Difference between revisions of "CSEP Minutes 06-06-2018"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* should focus on models that are most interesting. what constitutes an interesting model? | * should focus on models that are most interesting. what constitutes an interesting model? | ||
** send e-mail to modelers about the scientific questions that are hoped to be learned, and what could be publishable about improving our understanding of the earthquake process | ** send e-mail to modelers about the scientific questions that are hoped to be learned, and what could be publishable about improving our understanding of the earthquake process | ||
| − | ** valuation of models | + | ** valuation of models elaborate vs. simple models |
| − | ** spatial etas computational efficiency and stable parameterization | + | ** spatial etas computational efficiency and stable parameterization from usgs perspective |
| − | ** if | + | ** if models were simpler, they would be more straight forward to the reader |
| + | * important to prioritize valuable results due to limited developer/human resources | ||
* list of references/abstract describing the models in CSEP1. send email to models that have models installed in CSEP. | * list of references/abstract describing the models in CSEP1. send email to models that have models installed in CSEP. | ||
* M. Werner and D. Schorlemmer expert on different models | * M. Werner and D. Schorlemmer expert on different models | ||
Latest revision as of 22:43, 6 June 2018
Participants: D. Jackson; J. Gilchrist; J. Vidale; D. Rhoades; A. Michael and W. Savran
Minutes
Leadership Retreat
- Ned presentation on the future of CSEP, same information that has been presented before.
- Moving workshop around the time of SCEC annual meeting
CSEP1 Data set
- should focus on models that are most interesting. what constitutes an interesting model?
- send e-mail to modelers about the scientific questions that are hoped to be learned, and what could be publishable about improving our understanding of the earthquake process
- valuation of models elaborate vs. simple models
- spatial etas computational efficiency and stable parameterization from usgs perspective
- if models were simpler, they would be more straight forward to the reader
- important to prioritize valuable results due to limited developer/human resources
- list of references/abstract describing the models in CSEP1. send email to models that have models installed in CSEP.
- M. Werner and D. Schorlemmer expert on different models
