Difference between revisions of "Staff Priorities - Kevin"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | 5/19/15 | ||
+ | |||
== Yesterday: == | == Yesterday: == | ||
− | * | + | * refactored rupture variation probability modification code to make it simpler/more intuitive |
− | * | + | * unit tests to verify approach |
− | * | + | * need to further investigate issues with bumping up RV probabilities by a large amount in OEF scenarios as opposed to adding additional sources |
+ | * responded to UCERF3 questions from Feng | ||
+ | * skyped with Ned on USGS web service clients and needs for aftershock filter | ||
== Today: == | == Today: == | ||
+ | * launch new ETAS calcs for Ned | ||
* book Prague travel with Deb | * book Prague travel with Deb | ||
− | * | + | * respond to more UCERF3 questions from Feng |
− | * | + | * work on RV probability modification - should large increases be treated as separate source? |
+ | * check out USGS event webservice client from git, start updating to v1.0 specifications | ||
+ | * look at nightly unit test failure | ||
== Blocked: == | == Blocked: == |
Revision as of 17:31, 19 May 2015
5/19/15
Contents
Yesterday:
- refactored rupture variation probability modification code to make it simpler/more intuitive
* unit tests to verify approach * need to further investigate issues with bumping up RV probabilities by a large amount in OEF scenarios as opposed to adding additional sources
- responded to UCERF3 questions from Feng
- skyped with Ned on USGS web service clients and needs for aftershock filter
Today:
- launch new ETAS calcs for Ned
- book Prague travel with Deb
- respond to more UCERF3 questions from Feng
- work on RV probability modification - should large increases be treated as separate source?
- check out USGS event webservice client from git, start updating to v1.0 specifications
- look at nightly unit test failure
Blocked:
no
Followups:
no