Difference between revisions of "Staff Priorities - Kevin"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | 6/ | + | 6/16/15 |
== Yesterday: == | == Yesterday: == | ||
− | * | + | * responded to ETAS questions from Feng |
− | * | + | * GMPE UCERF3 vs UCERF2 MCEr calculations for CyberShake region |
− | * | + | * worked on moving CyberShake OEF results to Study 15.4 |
− | * | + | * worked on CyberShake tapered hypocenter distribution maps |
== Today: == | == Today: == | ||
− | * | + | * read through latest OAF tool document and follow up with Ned |
− | + | * more UCERF3/UCERF2 comparisons for CyberShake area - full hazard maps and maybe disaggs | |
− | * | + | * Cybershake OEF work for IUGG talk |
− | * | ||
== Blocked: == | == Blocked: == | ||
Line 17: | Line 16: | ||
== Followups: == | == Followups: == | ||
− | + | Ned on OAF tool | |
Revision as of 17:23, 16 June 2015
6/16/15
Yesterday:
- responded to ETAS questions from Feng
- GMPE UCERF3 vs UCERF2 MCEr calculations for CyberShake region
- worked on moving CyberShake OEF results to Study 15.4
- worked on CyberShake tapered hypocenter distribution maps
Today:
- read through latest OAF tool document and follow up with Ned
- more UCERF3/UCERF2 comparisons for CyberShake area - full hazard maps and maybe disaggs
- Cybershake OEF work for IUGG talk
Blocked:
no
Followups:
Ned on OAF tool
Lower priority or longer term tasks
- Fill in missing site/rupture distances in CyberShake DB for ERF 36 (200m)
- Compute maps with tapered CyberShake rupture variation distribution