Difference between revisions of "Staff Priorities - Kevin"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | 9/ | + | 9/23/15 |
== Yesterday: == | == Yesterday: == | ||
− | * | + | * major refactoring of MCEr calculations |
− | ** | + | ** separating plot from calculation code |
− | ** | + | ** common interface for CyberShake and GMPE based calculations |
− | + | ** improved documentation | |
− | ** | ||
− | |||
== Today: == | == Today: == | ||
+ | * finish MCEr refactoring | ||
* implement CB's proposed CyberShake/GMPE weighting algorithm: | * implement CB's proposed CyberShake/GMPE weighting algorithm: | ||
** average UCERF3 based GMPE calculations with UCERF2 based CyberShake calcs | ** average UCERF3 based GMPE calculations with UCERF2 based CyberShake calcs |
Revision as of 17:07, 23 September 2015
9/23/15
Yesterday:
- major refactoring of MCEr calculations
- separating plot from calculation code
- common interface for CyberShake and GMPE based calculations
- improved documentation
Today:
- finish MCEr refactoring
- implement CB's proposed CyberShake/GMPE weighting algorithm:
- average UCERF3 based GMPE calculations with UCERF2 based CyberShake calcs
- 1s: full GMPE weight, 10s: full CyberShake weight. Will linearly interpolate between for now but make it easy to swap in other weighting functions
- Apply weighted averaging directly to hazard curves (before RTGM calc) for probabilistic calcs, apply to spectrum for deterministic calculations.
- will use branch averaged UCERF3 for now, might eventually use partial logic tree if needed
- if time, continue mapping of historical earthquakes to UCERF3 ruptures in order to run ETAS simulations of aftershock sequences
Blocked:
no
Followups:
no
Lower priority or longer term tasks
- Fill in missing site/rupture distances in CyberShake DB for ERF 36 (200m)
- finish mapping of historical earthquakes to UCERF3 ruptures in order to run ETAS simulations of aftershock sequences