Difference between revisions of "CISM Evaluation Metrics"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 14: | Line 14: | ||
** Stress drop - magnitude | ** Stress drop - magnitude | ||
* Rupture speed | * Rupture speed | ||
+ | * Single (first large?) event characterstics | ||
* Recurrence time distributions for event sets of interest | * Recurrence time distributions for event sets of interest | ||
* Rupture jumping | * Rupture jumping |
Revision as of 21:56, 15 March 2017
List of Metrics
List of metrics/regression tests for all catalogs as a way to compare them, ensure that RSQSim is behaving the same on different machines, and to compare/validate results from updated versions of RSQSim:
- Magnitude-Frequency distribution
- Whole-system
- UCERF3 example: Gray is off fault and on fault sub-seismogenic, Blue is on fault supra-seismogenic, Red is total. These are nucleation MFDs (as opposed to participation)
- Region- and fault-specific (for more complex models)
- Whole-system
- Inter-event time and distance distributions
- Scaling relations
- Magnitude-area
- Slip-area
- Stress drop - magnitude
- Rupture speed
- Single (first large?) event characterstics
- Recurrence time distributions for event sets of interest
- Rupture jumping
RSQSim notes
- Most of these are already in plotEqs(), one of the RSQSim post-processing functions that Keith includes with RSQSim, but we probably want to do regional tests that focus on particular sites or faults as well.
- We should create a new function or package of them, similar to plotEqs() that does all the tests and reports/plots the results.
Additional tests and ways of comparing RSQSim catalogs, to both simulated and real data:
- We also want some measure of the divergence of these catalogs when small changes are made to the parameters, as well as the number of cores the simulations are run on.
- Lyapunov exponent
- Set up a reference rupture set or catalog.
- Compare regional RSQSim MFD’s to UCERF3’s on-fault MFD’s.